CleverDonkey.com » Commentary

The coming Muslim-Christian coalition in the US?

EngineerBoy — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:26:07 +0000

The coming Muslim-Christian coalition in the US? is brought to you by CleverDonkey.com - ...Musings, Commentary, Opinions, and Drivel!

Can't we all just get along? Probably not any time soon...

Disclaimer: the article below represents the noodlings of a dumbass who is talking about things way over his head, but which he nonetheless found interesting as a mental exercise.

When JFK was elected, the US had its first (and so far only) Roman Catholic president. Barack Obama was the first African American president. That leaves some interesting milestones still ahead of us, such as first female, first (openly) gay, and first (openly) atheist/agnostic.

I think there’s a good chance that we’ll hit all of those milestones, at some point, and that it’s just a matter of ‘when’. I also think we’ll hit them in that order (female, gay, secular). And I also think that as we hit each milestone, it will create a greatly increasing disturbance among conservative US voters.

The first milestone, female, will not have any overtly negative reaction at home or abroad. There have been plenty of female heads of state, and anybody who publicly takes issue with that will be nearly universally condemned as a backwards nincompoop.

However, the next one (first gay) would set up the beginnings of a political holy war, as the groups who are anti-gay are really committed to being anti-gay. These are people who put the behavior of same-sex consenting adults in the same category as child molestation or bestiality. They will see a gay US President as the beginning of the end of the world, and will fight against it appropriately.

But the last one (first secular) would potentially set up an actual Holy War (notice the caps). There was a recent survey that showed that people of faith trust atheists to the same level that they trust rapists. Yes, really. And a group with that outlook is going to work diligently (to say the least) to prevent it from happening.

Just as an exercise (not a prediction), I could see the future of Presidential politics progressing thusly (major party candidates, unless otherwise specified):

2012 – Obama re-elected, possible female VP (Clinton)
2016 – female President
2020 – gay VP nominee
2024 – gay Presidential nominee
2028 – secular serious 3rd party Presidential candidate
2032 – gay President, secular VP nominee
2036 – secular President

Yes, that goes 24 years into the future, and that seems like forever. But consider if we were to look backwards, 24 years ago was the election of George H.W. Bush. Not that long ago, for some of us. Again, that is not a prediction as much as one possible future outcome, the likelihood of which is open to debate.

However, regardless of the actual dates and progression, I think we’ll eventually see female, gay, and secular presidents in the US, and that that progression of events will stir ever increasing ire among conservative Christian US voters.

Interestingly enough, there is another group whose reactions would, in my estimation, parallel those of conservative Christian US voters – namely, Muslims. I am not Muslim, nor am I a student of Islam, but my lay-person’s understanding of Islam is that they generally hold that women should be subservient to men, that homosexuality is unacceptable, and that the faithless can be subject to persecution and even death.

Also, I’ve seen estimates that project the Muslim population will double or triple over the next 20 years in the US. One thing that has been consistent throughout US history is that while immigrant populations may retain a lot of their cultural heritage, they all usually end up ‘going native’ and seeing themselves as Americans, not as displaced immigrants in a strange land.

So, let’s project to a point 24 years in the future. There’s a larger, fairly well assimilated Muslim population in the US, and an increasing presence of openly gay and secular candidates on the national election stage. Both the conservative Christian base and the growing Muslim-American community would have significant opposition to these types of candidates.

And there’s nothing, and I mean *nothing*, that unites groups like having a common enemy. Politics makes for strange bedfellows, and although in today’s terror-focused, post 9-11 world it seems unlikely that Christians and Muslims would form a political alliance, time heals a lot of wounds. Arguably, Muslims and Christians believe in the same God, and there are a lot of overlaps in their faiths, as well as a lot of differences. However, in the face of a common enemy, and a heretical enemy at that, historical differences tend to be de-emphasized, and commonalities highlighted.

So, am I sitting here as a Nostradomus-like seer laying out prophecies? No, it’s more of a mental exercise, and quite frankly started as a lark, but the more I considered a potential Christian-Muslim coalition, the harder it became to rule it out completely, and the easier it became to consider it as a realistic potential outcome.

How likely is this outcome? I don’t know – as stated in the disclaimer at the top of this article, I’m just a dumbass with a blog who is noodling on things far outside my area of expertise. America’s Jewish population and/or our alliance with Israel could be a wildcard. The non-dogmatic US population could refuse to accept gay and/or secular candidates for a lot longer than is being speculated here. And it could also be the case that both conservative Christian and Muslim US voters would have an equally vehement opposition to gay and secular candidates, but without forming any sort of alliance.

Dumbassery aside, however, I think it is at least plausible that, if faced with the prospect of an atheist/agnostic US President, the US Christian and Muslim communities could form an alliance to fight against such a candidate. I’m not hoping this happens, I’m not saying I know it’s going to happen, and I’m not saying it should (or shouldn’t) happen. However, what I am saying is that as implausible as a Muslim-Christian coalition seems today, I would not be surprised to see it happen in the future.

And just how unlikely is a Christian-Muslim coalition? Well, consider that, today, the United States’ closest ally is Great Britain, and in the decade after the Revolutionary War I’m sure that would have seemed like an outlandish prospect. The US also counts Germany and Japan among our closest allies, and that would have seemed unlikely in the decade after WWII and Pearl Harbor. Think Russia after the Cold War, or China after Korea. All are now our allies, or at least our economic partners, and such alliances and partnerships would have seemed ludicrous to contemplate in the time period just after the hottest hostilities.

And that’s part of the historical context here. I can look back over my lifetime and see the birth, growth, and death of many conflicts. For example, my grandfather was a WWII vet. In the 60′s, he gave us our first color television, and we couldn’t have been more excited the day it was delivered and set up. However, my grandfather checked the labels on the back of the set, saw it had been made in Japan, and angrily returned it because he had clearly indicated he would not purchase a TV from our WWII enemies. However, my father’s and my generation defined material success, in part, as having a Walkman, a Betamax, and an Accord, meaning that my grandfather’s grudge didn’t even last a full generation.

As I continued to grow up in the 60′s and 70′s, I experienced the tail end of the civil rights movement. I did civil defense drills in school, hiding under my desk in preparation for the nuclear holocaust that was surely coming as we faced down the godless communists during the Cold War.

Then there were the weekly, sometimes daily, reports of violence and terrorism in Northern Ireland. There was the rise of Japan in the 80′s, when they were an economic powerhouse that was going to take over the US, both economically and culturally. Today it’s the terroristic threat of ‘radical Islam’ and the economic rise of China that are threatening our way of life.

But, these, too, shall pass. Old conflicts and enemies fade away, sometimes to be forgotten, sometimes to become friends and allies, always leading to a new reality in the future. It’s the way of the world. Does that mean that a Muslim-Christian coalition will definitely come to pass in the US? Of course not, but it means that, to me, it is a distinct possibility, and I’ll be interested to see how events progress.

America’s Economic Bipolarity

EngineerBoy — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 05:45:20 +0000

America’s Economic Bipolarity is brought to you by CleverDonkey.com - ...Musings, Commentary, Opinions, and Drivel!

Income Equality (lower is more equal)

I’m a data person, and any time I have conceptions, preconceptions, prejudices, opinions, or assumptions, and there is relevant data available, I like to challenge my own opinions with facts. One opinion I hold is that the United States is losing ground on being the ‘Land of Opportunity’ from an economic perspective.

I’ll stop here to state that I understand I’m talking about ‘first world problems’, and that the average American has it pretty good compared to the average world citizen. Also, I’m not an economist, sociologist, futurist, or any other kind of credentialed -ist (other than ‘technologist’), so these are just the noodlings of an interested observer.

That being said, the people that put together the CIA World Fact Book seem to know a lot of things about a lot of things, and they share a portion of what they know via their public site. The charts you see on this page are direct translations of their data into graphical form, and all credit/blame for that data goes to them.

One of the things they gather and post information about is relative income equality for countries around the world. They share that information on this page:

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2172.html

The chart on the top right shows the Income Equality of the largest 100 countries (by population) from the CIA table, where a larger number is less income equality, and a lower number is more income equality (I know that’s counter-intuitive, but I didn’t develop the GINI scale). So, the countries to the left-hand side of the chart are the most unequal from an income distribution perspective, and those on the right are the most equal. The thumbnail view of the chart is pretty small (click chart for larger view), but the red line is the United States, and the green lines are the rest of the G8 countries. You can see that the US is the left-most G8 member, meaning the one with the least equitable income distribution.

That sucks. What it means is that the gap between rich and poor is pretty wide. I think we can all look back over the last few years or decades and see that this has been happening, so although our place in the bottom third of countries isn’t a complete surprise, being the worst of the G8 nations is a bit disheartening.

Income Equality Trending (higher means increasing inequality)

I think that an impartial observer would agree that things are not good from an economic perspective in America today. However, we have a legacy of bouncing back from adversity and overcoming obstacles. Are we doing that here?

As you can see in the chart to the right (click chart for larger view), we are not only not improving, but are continuing to get worse. In fact, only two G8 nations (Italy, Japan) have income equality gaps that are getting larger faster than ours. Once again, the US is the red bar, and the rest of the G8 are the green bars.

So far all I’ve done is said we’re drowning, and then described the water. What are the causes and solutions to this problem? Although I have definite opinions about how we ended up where we are, I am not qualified to make any definitive statements about the economic and political forces that have put us where we are. Note that I love to share my opinions, and I think that most of them are de facto facts just by virtue of being my opinions, but in this instance I don’t want to have this discussion degrade into partisan politics and bickering.

Also, I’m even less qualified to offer solutions. I find it challenging to contribute to managing the finances of our household, and my wife does almost all of that work in the first place, with a competency that I can only stand back and admire with awe. However, I do have opinions about what world economic and political leaders should be doing, but once again I don’t want the point of this discussion to be lost in partisanship and dogma.

And the point of this discussion is simply to point out, as factually and unemotionally as possible, where we are today. The income gap in the US is one of the widest in the developed world, and it’s getting worse. Income inequality is not the only factor that plays into quality of life, but consider, for a moment, the two extremes of income equality.

In the most unequal distribution, one single person would control all of the wealth of a country. In the most equal distribution, everyone would have the exact same economic prospects. I wouldn’t want to live in either of those countries. In the most unequal one, there would be no chance to make a living or demonstrate economic worth, and any sustenance or shelter would be based on the largesse of the Grand Poobah. In the perfectly equal one, the same would be true about economic worth – excellence and hard work would not be rewarded, because everybody would have the exact same standard of living regardless of ability, drive, ambition, or effectiveness.

Unfortunately, the United States is moving closer towards the situation where more and more of the country’s wealth is being held by fewer and fewer citizens. In fact, according to a recent study: “Even the Roman Empire, a society built on conquest and slave labor, had a more equitable income distribution.” The article also goes on to explain why the CIA publishes income inequality figures in the first place: “Since too much inequality can foment revolt and instability, the CIA regularly updates statistics on income distribution for countries around the world, including the U.S.”

Does that match your vision of the United States? That we are as decadent as Rome before the fall? That China, the land of a billion socialist peasants, has a more equitable distribution of income? That our immediate neighbors on the chart of income inequality are Uganda, Cambodia, Camaroon, Bulgaria, Jamaica, and Mozambique? Is that really the economic neighborhood for a nation that considers itself the leader of the free world? And not only that, it’s only getting worse, instead of better?

I don’t know about you, but none of that matches my expectation of the United States. We are the land of opportunity. We are a classless society, where anybody from any background can succeed through sheer force of will. However, as wealth accumulates with a small group of the super-rich, so does economic and political power.

On a level playing field, I applaud anyone who is able to create wealth for themselves and their family. However, I think it is clear from the simple charts on this page that the playing field is not level in the US.

And from here on out I will be interjecting opinion – as the rich have gotten richer, they have used their economic and political power to rig the game in their favor. To protect what they have, and to have the opportunity to accumulate more. I can understand that impulse, because who doesn’t want to protect and grow what is theirs?

However, every flexing of political muscle by the rich to keep and grow their wealth also has the equal and opposite reaction of denying someone less rich the opportunity for increased economic success. I don’t know how to solve it, but the first step is admitting there is a problem. I’m not sure how anyone could look at these figures still not be convinced that something is wrong and needs to be done to restore balance to the economic prospects of all Americans.

That’s where We the People and the government come in. It should not be the job of the government to redistribute wealth by fiat. However, it should be the job of government to make sure the playing field is level and that everyone has an equal opportunity. Given the amount of money it takes to mount a campaign for federal office, the candidates are increasingly either personally rich, backed by the rich, or a combination of both. What that means to me is that those that have the gold are making the rules.

That has always been the case, to a certain extent, and people with money will always be able to have an outsized impact by buying the cooperation of those willing to sell their influence. However, it seems that this has become the rule rather than the exception in American politics today. And although I can’t offer concrete solutions, I think the first step is for We the People to use the polling booth to reject candidates who, by their actions (not words), have shown their support for fostering and increasing the current economic imbalance.

How I Beat Insomnia

EngineerBoy — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:04:44 +0000

How I Beat Insomnia is brought to you by CleverDonkey.com - ...Musings, Commentary, Opinions, and Drivel!

Don't watch this to go to sleep...

First, let me say that I am not a doctor and I make no claims that what worked for me will work for anyone else, or that anyone else should try the things described here. However, I did want to relate what worked for me so that others who may have had it work for them could see they are not alone, or those thinking about trying it will see that there is at least one case where it worked. The ‘cure’ described here goes against every piece of conventional wisdom and medical advice that I have ever seen about insomnia, which made me doubly motivated to share it, since I know that it works for me.

When I was in my early teens I had an episode of sleep paralysis, described here. It was very disturbing, and from that time up until my 40′s, I struggled with insomnia. I tried many things:

Sleeping pills: knocked me out, but I did not feel rested, and I did not want to take pills regularly even if they worked.

Sleep hygiene: trying to sleep in a dark, quiet place simply does not work for me, to this day, and all the wind-down, no-TV, no-computer stuff did nothing more than make me even more unable to sleep.

No caffeine: I would go caffeine free for months, with no effect.

No food after 6pm: Made no difference.

Diet/exercise: No difference.

Etc.

I tried anything and everything, but I would just lay wide awake, mind racing, then typically fall asleep at 5-6am, then have to wake up at 7am and start all over again. This went on, to varying degrees, for *decades*.

However, as the years passed I found that there were certain combinations of factors that usually resulted in me falling asleep. I’m a fairly old fart, and when I was growing up there weren’t VCRs, DVDs, or TiVos, there was just the TV, and what was on, was on, and that was it. However, once the age of VCRs started, I began collecting movies, usually my old favorites. And I began to notice that when I couldn’t sleep, and I would go out to my recliner and pop in an old, favorite, well-known movie, I would usually go to sleep in my chair, and usually stay asleep.

And, if I happened to wake up, I could rewind the movie to where I had fallen asleep, start watching again, and fall back to sleep. And this worked pretty much like clockwork. Not perfect, but it worked 80%-90% of the time. In fact, it worked so well that it started to relieve the tension that I felt at bed time, and sometimes allowed me to fall asleep in bed and get a good night’s sleep, because I knew that if I found I couldn’t sleep, I could go out to the living room, pop in an old movie, recline, and go to sleep.

I realized that having the distraction of something to watch, and having it be something that was entertaining (because I already knew I liked it) without being engaging (because it was something I had already seen and knew the story), allowed me to disconnect and drift off to sleep.

Watching something new didn’t work. Watching the news didn’t work. Listening to music made my skin crawl. Reading would rarely work, because I couldn’t force myself to reread books that I already knew, and new books either bored me because they sucked or engaged me because they were good, but in neither case did it put me to sleep.

Then, as cable TV channels proliferated, it became even easier, as all the old shows that I knew and loved were in high rotation on Nickelodeon, TBS, WGN, local affiliates, etc. So, I didn’t necessarily need to go out to the living room and pop in a tape, I could watch the TV in the bedroom and get the same result, usually.

However, watching TV in the bedroom wasn’t necessarily universally popular either, as the flickering images and sounds that put me to sleep didn’t necessarily work the same magic on my wife. Also, it was hit or miss on finding something sleep-inducing.

Then along came TiVo, and the advent of cheap, small LCD televisions. Today, we have a regular TV and TiVo in the bedroom, but I also have a small LCD TV (7″) on my side of the bed, below the level of the mattress where only I can see it, also connected to the TiVo. I also have a pair of SleepPhones plugged into the little TV, which I can wear to go to sleep. So, now, my nightly routine is usually to turn on my little bedside TV (on which I have the brightness turned way down to decrease the flicker effect), put on my SleepPhones, put the TiVo on some old show, and then go to sleep.

Just like that. In fact, many nights I don’t even watch the little TV, I just drift off to sleep naturally. But, if I wake up in the night and can’t get back to sleep, I can turn it on, put on the headphones, and doze right back off. Also note that after a while the stretchiness of the SleepPhones starts to wear out (they are essentially a headband with little imbedded speakers that align with your ears), so when I fall asleep and move my head, the little speakers move off my ears so that I don’t hear the TV as I sleep, usually.

So, this has become the nearly perfect solution. The light from the little TV doesn’t bother my wife, the SleepPhones are comfortable, the TiVo has a nice selection of shows, and I sleep very well every single night.

Note that I have a job where I am frequently awakened in the middle of the night to deal with issues, so being able to wake up and fully engage in work, then disengage and go right back to sleep is critical for me, and this works.

Your mileage may vary, and again this goes against almost all aspects of sleep hygiene. But it works for me, and works 99.9999% of the time. It has changed my life to the point where I don’t even think about sleep any more, I just sleep. After decades of having every single night be a stress-filled struggle, it’s an amazing difference. And it’s been working for over a decade now, so it’s not something new and novel that is working because of the placebo effect.

For those of you struggling with sleep issues, I can only suggest that you keep an open mind about what the experts might say about dealing with it, as every person is different, and what works for one person, or even the majority of people, may not work for you. So keep trying, because only by trying new things will you ever find what works for you. Good luck, and good night!

A Day in the Life of a Typical American, or how I learned to stop worrying and not be hypocritical about ‘socialism’

We’ll miss you, Weagle…

EngineerBoy — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:42:54 +0000

We’ll miss you, Weagle… is brought to you by CleverDonkey.com - ...Musings, Commentary, Opinions, and Drivel!

Weagle at the beach

Today was the day we took Weagle to the vet for the last time, after her battle with lymphoma. The photo here is of her last visit to Galveston, which was yesterday. She loved the beach, it was her favorite place, so we took her for one last visit. As you can see, we had the beach to ourselves, down by San Luis Pass, and Weagle strolled in the surf and chuffed at some birds, and had her own Sausage McMuffin as a treat.

Weagle was an extraordinary being. She came into our lives as a tiny puppy, adopted from the Houston SPCA after Houston was devastated by storm damage and flooding from Tropical Storm Allison. We knew there would be a lot of dogs hitting the shelters after the storm, and we knew we had to help save at least one.

When we got to the shelter, there were two of cutest little black-and-brown puppies in a crate together, litter-mates. The sign said they were six weeks old, and that they were Rottweiler/Labrador crosses. We picked one to bring home, and she fit in my cupped palms, and was the calmest, sweetest dog we had ever met. That changed dramatically once we got her de-wormed and her true nature as a smart, protective, complex, loving, vigilant, fiercely loyal family member was revealed.

We gave her the name of Princess Buttercup (from the film The Princess Bride), and as she grew her face (and howl) began to look very much like a beagle, so we started referring to her by the nickname of Rottweagle (combination of Rottweiler and Beagle), which was quickly shortened to Weagle, and became her permanent name. We never did figure out her ancestry.

I wrote more about her protective and loving nature two years ago, which you can read here: http://www.cleverdonkey.com/1385-wonderful-weagle/.

Was she perfect? No, but who is? She barked too much, although it was with the best intentions, as she always wanted us to be aware of any real-or-perceived dangers, and we never could convince her the postman wasn’t dangerous (as far as we knew). She did not enjoy rambunctious puppies, although she tolerated them with extraordinary displays of benign disdain. She never fully accepted that she was not part of the committee of humans that ran the household, and although she was never actively mutinous, she did sometimes comply to requests with melodramatic resignation and doggy eye-rolling.

But she was a great soul, and highly intelligent. We recently watched an episode of Nova ScienceNow, where they asked the question, ‘How Smart Are Animals?‘, and they showed some of the astonishing levels of intelligence demonstrated by dogs (and dolphins and octopuses and parrots). And while it was a very interesting program, it wasn’t all that surprising to us, because Weagle was damn smart. Smartness is not always convenient in a pet, because intelligence means that the dog will take your commands more like requests, and they will assess those requests for validity, and then act only when they have thought it through.

That could be frustrating at times, when we just wanted her to do what we said, but it also meant that we knew that no stranger or ne’er-do-well would ever be able to order her around into blind obedience, just because they spoke authoritatively. Unlike a gun or other weapon for home protection, we knew Weagle could never be disarmed (or taken away and turned against us). There’s no sleep as relaxing as when you’re being watched over by a benevolent canine Terminator.

But now she’s gone. We still have her two brothers: Biscuit, our blonde white-shepherd cross of unknown ancestry, and Ruckus, our probably-a-runt-Rottweiler-but-maybe-some-kind-of-hound-mixed-in-there-too.

Biscuit has become Avelynn’s self-appointed protector, which was surprising to us, as he’d always seemed like a pretty laid-back surfer-dude type before this. He’s older than Weagle, but appears to be going strong.

Ruckus is four now, and while he’s not nearly as smart as Weagle or Biscuit, he has a huge heart full of nothing but love for the family, and he’s happiest when he knows he’s doing the right thing.

We love them both, and we’re glad that Weagle was around long enough to show Ruckus the ropes, and pass down the responsibility for guarding the family to him, so that now she can rest, peacefully. We’ll miss you, Weags.

How To: Get iced-tea stains out of your plastic pitcher

EngineerBoy — Sun, 12 Dec 2010 13:04:13 +0000

How To: Get iced-tea stains out of your plastic pitcher is brought to you by CleverDonkey.com - ...Musings, Commentary, Opinions, and Drivel!

The pitcher in question...

I love home-made iced tea, and have gone so far as to post my recipe for it. As you can see in the picture to the right, I use translucent Tupperware 1-gallon pitchers for the tea, and after over a year of use the pitchers were getting tea-stained.

I did a lot of things to try to remove the stains – scrubbing the hell out of them, letting them soak overnight with dish soap, filling them with boiling water hoping to cook the stains out, etc, etc, etc. Nothing worked and the stains just kept getting more stainier.

I eventually turned to the web, and many (many) people recommended soaking overnight filled with warm water and a little bleach (yuck!) or OxiClean (double-yuck!!), but using any kind of chemical like that seemed, well, yucky.

Then I found someone who said they also had a problem with tea staining their plastic pitchers, and they solved it by alternating iced tea with lemonade, and the acidity of the lemonade helped keep the pitchers clean.

I like lemonade, but not enough to put it into my homemade drink-making routine, but it got me thinking. Specifically, it got me thinking about citric acid, which is the part of the lemonade that is, well, acidic, and I started wondering if I could just buy some citric acid somewhere.

The Tea-Stain Terminator

And, as in almost all cases where I’m looking to see if something is available on the web, I turned to Amazon.com, and lo and behold, they had some – quite a few options, in fact. I ended up ordering the liquid citric acid in a glass jar, pictured to the right.

I took my most stained pitcher, put about 2 ounces of the citric acid in it, and filled it to the brim with hot tap water and let it soak overnight. The next day I poured out the water, scrubbed and rinsed the inside, and saw a tremendous improvement, although it was still a bit stained.

But, after treating it a few more times in rotation as the pitcher became empty again, it is now very, very clean. If you inspect it very closely you can still see some slight discoloration, but it isn’t noticeable in normal use, and seems to be lessening over time with regular treatments.

My plan is now to use this treatment every once in a while on my pitchers, to keep them clean. And, unlike with bleach or detergents, the worst case scenario is that the treatments might impart a slight citrus taste to the tea, which I don’t think I’d mind if and when it ever happens – and I certainly won’t be worried about any side-effects from ingesting a toxic chemical, because it’s just citric acid, which is edible.

So, if you have stained plastic food containers and are wondering how to safely get them clean, you may want to try soaking them in citric acid (or lemonade, if you are so inclined) and let a natural, edible acid do the work for you.

Homemade breakfast taquito recipe

EngineerBoy — Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:51:58 +0000

Homemade breakfast taquito recipe is brought to you by CleverDonkey.com - ...Musings, Commentary, Opinions, and Drivel!

The basic ingredients

We love breakfast taquitos, usually from Whataburger or a local Mexican restaurant, but also wanted to make them at home from time to time, and have developed this recipe over a few iterations:

Ingredients:

2 potatoes
6 eggs
6 scallions, chopped
3 oversized flour tortillas
2 tbsp cooking oil
2 tbsp butter
Salt
Pepper
Optional: shredded cheese, salsa, Tabasco sauce, or whatever else you might want to try putting on a breakfast taco

Start a heavy, large skillet heating (we use cast iron) on medium-high heat (set to 7 on our electric that goes to 10). Wash the potatoes and shred them with a grater, leaving the skins on. Spread the shredded potatoes in an even layer on a microwave-safe plate, and microwave them on high for 5 minutes, uncovered. Remove from the microwave and set aside. This step is important because to get crispy hash browns requires that excess moisture be removed from the potatoes before frying.

Put the oil in the hot pan and swirl it around to coat evenly, then add the chopped scallions. Cook the scallions until tender and slightly browned, then add the potatoes in an even layer. While the potatoes fry undisturbed, start another large skillet heating on medium-low (3 on our stove that goes up to 10).

Crispy, brown potatoes...yum!

Crack the eggs into a bowl, add salt and pepper to taste, and stir them up lightly, as if making scrambled eggs. Meanwhile, let the potatoes fry without stirring until the bottom layer starts to get brown and crispy, then attempt to flip the whole mess over as a whole potato cake, as seen in the accompanying picture. Expect some breakage of the potato cake, but try to keep it in largish pieces.

Let the potatoes continue to fry until the bottom starts to brown again, and once it looks like the potatoes are close to finishing, put some butter into the other preheating skillet to melt. The skillet should be hot enough to melt the butter quickly and with a little bit of sizzle, but not brown the butter.

Once the butter has melted, add the eggs and salt and pepper to taste. Cook the eggs with intermittent stirring to make scrambled eggs. While the eggs are finishing up, put the three tortillas in the microwave covered by a moistened paper towel and heat for 30-60 seconds on high (depends on your microwave, but you want them piping hot!). The moistened paper towel keeps them from drying out and helps prevent cracking or tearing when you put together your taquito.

Tip: It’s a good idea to pull the tortillas apart from one another before heating, so that there aren’t places where they are stuck together from being packaged together. If you don’t do this, then after you heat them and try to pull them apart you could create holes and tears in the tortilla where they are stuck together, and now much more delicate because they are heated, so it’s good to separate them while they are still unheated.

The finished product

Now we’re ready to assemble! Lay one of the tortillas on a plate, scoop some eggs and potatoes into it, put some shredded cheese (and/or salsa and/or Tabasco sauce and/or whatever you prefer!) on top, roll it up, and you’re ready to go!

This isn’t a health food, so we rarely indulge in it, but some Sunday mornings you just need a nice, big, tasty breakfast, and this really fits the bill for us when that happens.

Enjoy!

Mourn the dead, honor the heroes, fight injustice, embrace freedom, celebrate life, and, on today of all days, forget to hate.

EngineerBoy — Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:26:47 +0000

Mourn the dead, honor the heroes, fight injustice, embrace freedom, celebrate life, and, on today of all days, forget to hate. is brought to you by CleverDonkey.com - ...Musings, Commentary, Opinions, and Drivel!

Peace

Mourn the dead, honor the heroes, fight injustice, embrace freedom, celebrate life, and, on today of all days, forget to hate.

Peace.

Mynagirl’s Fashion Report Emmys 2010

mynagirl — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:34:30 +0000

Mynagirl’s Fashion Report Emmys 2010 is brought to you by CleverDonkey.com - ...Musings, Commentary, Opinions, and Drivel!

Welcome back to the Mynagirl Fashion report, resurrected after many years on hiatus!! Baby Bootsie has been sleeping peacefully this evening, so I’ve been able to have a nip and quip at the fashion for the 2010 Emmys. Thanks much to technical crew Engineerboy for giving us these gorgeous images armed with only a remote, a capture card, and some great timing.

Ladies in Nude

Pale neutrals and golds were a definite trend.

Gugu Mbatha-Raw	Mariska Hargitay
Jewel in Zuhair Murad	Claire Danes in Armani Privé
Claire Danes wears the serious sequins

Sofia Vergara from Modern Family brightens the trend a little with a golden yellow Carolina Herrera. Engineerboy liked that the beadwork looked like the human genome project.

Sofia Vergara in Carolina Herrera

Golden girl

Glenn Close and her daughter wore matching pale patchwork-y dresses that looked like but presumably weren’t vinyl

Glenn Close and her daughter Annie in matching Rubin Singer

Heavy Hardware

There were a couple Greco-Roman looks, some more successful than not. I have to say, while I like the cut of Kim Kardashian’s Marchesa column, it’s not very flattering on her. Update – I have become a convert of this dress after seeing some better camera angles on it. I think Kim looks very statuesque and classic.

Kim Kardashian in a white grecian column

Kim Kardashian in Marchesa

Cool of newlywed Anna Paquin to honor and wear Alexander McQueen, but the gown is better up top than on bottom. Honestly, it looks a bit like she accidentally tucked the hem into her pantyhose.

The Moyers

Anna Paquin in her Alexander McQueen

And I have no idea who this is (gasp.. should I? Usually my trashy magazine reading serves me so well), but this is a fugly nightmare of a look on her. The hair is messy, the dress is all over the place, and she’s so bony. Do not like.

Hot White Grecian Mess

In the Navy

Dark midnight blue was definitely a trend. I’m sure a lot of these dresses look great in person but they’re nearly as boring as black on camera. At least some of the shapes were nice.

Lea Michelle in Oscar de la Renta

Jane Krakowski

Julie Bowen in a navy column

Purple People-Eaters

Purple and lilac were popular this year. Emily Deschanel, Christina Hendricks, and Jane Lynch all wore shades in this range. Jane Lynch wins hands down. Christina Hendricks may or may not have murdered some Fraggles for her dress. (Uh-oh, I think I’ve made that joke before in previous years. Oh well.)

Emily Deschanel in purple ruffles

Emily Deschanel in purple

Christina Hendricks looks like a refugee from Dancing with the Stars in her maribou-adorned lilac mermaid gown. Oh it’s Zac Posen, that’s why I don’t like it…

Christina Hendricks from Mad Men showing some serious skin (and what's underneath)

Jane Lynch is a little more pulled together in amethyst taffeta:

Jane Lynch, supporting actress nominee in an amethyst one-shouldered gown by Ali Rahimi

Lovely taffeta shape

Classic (or Boring) Black

Boy were there a lot of boring black dresses.

Carrie Ann Inaba in black

Black Tea Length Taffeta and Tulle

..and another black dress

...and another. Kate Gosselin also in black.

Eva Longoria spruces up her basic black column with chandelier earrings and an athlete as her accessories.

Eva Longoria and Tony Parker

Edie Falco wears YAOSBD, yet another one-shouldered black dress. Yawn.

Edie Falco in black

Statement Jewelry

I especially loved a lot of the statement jewelry at the Emmys.

Julia Louis-Dreyfus rocks the green earrings (chrysoprase perhaps?)

Julia Louis-Dreyfus

Padma Lakshmi wears a great glittery column necklace

Padma Lakshmi and her statement necklace

Glittery column necklace

Jewel wears some cool large earrings

Jewel in her Jacob & Co jeweled earrings

Lea Michelle’s collar necklace is out of this world!!

Lea Michelle's amazing collar necklace

... and an extreme closeup

Although not my absolute favorite, KK’s big bracelet was pretty fun as well.

Kim K rocks some criss-crossy diamond bling

Julia Ormond is safe from evil laser-wielding bad guys with her gilted Wonder Woman cuffs.

Laser-deflecting goodness!!

Hmmm, we wish you hadn’t

Keri Russell chose vintage and it just didn’t flatter her unfortunately. I want to like it because it wasn’t boring black but wow, it just didn’t fit at all.

Keri Russell in ill-fitting vintage

yeah... no...

January Jones sports the rocker chick black nail polish with a truly unflattering Versace. It kinda looks like diner seating. Or plastic plates. Or the liner to an above-ground pool.

January Jones in Versace

January Jones in that keerazy Versace

Commentator Maria Menounous wore a glittery thing that looks… at first glance… kind of pretty. Then she turns around. She makes sure to turn around.

Maria Menounous...

...wears a...

... really backless dress

Lauren Graham sports a truly shapeless dress. Wow, not doin’ it for her. And you can’t even say it probably looked better on the hanger, that thing’s a drapey mess no matter what it’s hanging on.

Lauren Graham in shapeless color blocking

How I went from loving to loathing TiVo…

EngineerBoy — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 22:22:33 +0000

How I went from loving to loathing TiVo… is brought to you by CleverDonkey.com - ...Musings, Commentary, Opinions, and Drivel!

I still *want* to love you, but you're losing me

Dear TiVo,

I read two articles recently that spurred me to write you this letter. The first article described how at the end of July 2009 you had 3.05 million subscribers, but at the end of July 2010 you were down to 2.38 million. Five years ago this would have surprised me, but not any more.

The second article was from your site, describing the spiffy new QWERTY TiVo remote with a sliding face and a full keyboard. I was overjoyed by the news, as I’ve been waiting for a remote like this since I bought and activated my first TiVo back in 2002. I read the article in great anticipation, wondering how pricey the remote would be. Hm, $90. Not unreachable, but seemingly a little steep, which would make it in keeping with everything else you sell.

But then I got to the last paragraph, where the last sentence read:

“The new remote will work with TiVo Premiere, Premiere XL, TiVo Series3, TiVo HD, and TiVo HD XL boxes.”

No Series 1? No Series 2 or Dual-Tuner? Leaving us faithful early adopters behind again, are we?

Typical. This is typical of everything I have come to expect from you over the years. I still love TiVo-the-technical-solution, but with TiVo-the-company I have gone from love to like to not caring to being annoyed and, finally, to loathing, where I am today.

I now own and use 5 (count ‘em) TiVos, but they are all Series 2. My disillusionment began in earnest when you released the Series3 boxes, and included things like YouTube browsing that were not made available to Series2 owners. Now, you had a story for why this was so, which was something about Flash, I think, but I didn’t (and still don’t) buy it. If you had wanted to make it work, you could have. But, you chose to have those features and functions be differentiators to try and get Series2 owners to upgrade.

So close, and yet so far away

And it’s continued to be that way over the years, up through the latest insult of not letting us have the new remote (pictured at left). You continue to add new and improved features and functions, very few of which are made available to your existing base of owners, unless they have the latest and greatest. Now, I understand this from a business perspective, as I work in technology, so I know that it’s hard to keep the installed base happy. It’s very easy to add new features and functions to totally new and redesigned devices, and your bean-counters are happy to see the R&D and other expenses that go into anything that will grab new customers and dollars.

I can visualize the meetings where you discussed the strategy of what to do with the installed base. Spending money on something that will make the installed base happier is not a strategy that reaps short-term benefits, so it’s difficult for people to get behind it and make those investments. Conversely, it’s much easier to talk about investing in the new model with the new features that will open up new markets and bring in new customers and new revenues. *Everybody* can get behind that, and nobody gets fired for trying to grow the business.

But people do get fired for spending money on things that are difficult to quantify, like the care and feeding of existing customers. However, the sign of a truly successful company is that they do exactly that. It’s like flossing your teeth. If I don’t floss today, nothing bad really happens. If I don’t floss this month, or even this year, there may be no noticeable negative impact from my perspective.

But if I never floss? Eventually I’ll start losing my teeth. And teeth, like customers, are things that, once you’ve neglected them to the point that you lose them, you never get them back. Well TiVo, you haven’t been flossing, and you have decayed my loyalty as a customer to the point where now I hope that some viable alternative presents itself, so that I can leave you behind.

The good news, for you, is that the technology of the TiVo is awesome. Usability is great, and you have features and functions that far outstrip anything that the cable companies offer. However, from my cable company I can get an HD DVR for $5/month with no other out-of-pocket expense. With you I’d have to spend $300-$500 to get the new TiVo Premiere, and then cough up another $300 for lifetime service, or $11/month for the monthly services. Your DVR is far better than the one my cable company offers, but the three year cost for a TiVo Premiere for me would be $800, while the three year cost for my cable company’s DVR would be $180.

Not only are you more than four times more expensive, but you only have a one-year warranty, so if my TiVo has a problem in year 2 or 3 it falls to me to fix it out of my own pocket. My cable company will send me a replacement box at no cost if their DVR has problems.

So, with TiVo I get a slicker product but at over 4 times the cost, and I also have to assume the risk of repair costs after the first year. You’re good, but you’re not that good. So, for the first time in eight years I am open to an alternative. I don’t think it’s out there, yet, but if I’m ready and willing to move away from TiVo that means there are others like me who are, too.

I do hope that you figure out how to survive, and how to offer your products at a far more reasonable cost. I know that cable companies are licensing your software to put on their set-top boxes, and I can see this being a way for you to survive. My hope is that you are able to maintain the full feature set when provided by a cable company, because I can see them wanting you to disable or degrade certain functions so that they maintain control of their user base. Don’t do that, please?

And I think one thing that has become clear over time is that your subscription fees are poisoning your business model. Either make me buy the device with a huge up-front cash outlay *or* charge me a monthly fee, but don’t do both. For a $500 up-front purchase price you should be able to provide the programming information at no additional charge. If you don’t want to do that, then let me get the box for $10-$15/month and no up-front fee, and back it with an ongoing warranty just like my cable company does. I’d do that in a heartbeat – get a TiVo Premiere for nothing up front and $15/month? Sweet. How about doing that?

But, after 8 years I feel that I know you well enough to know that you won’t do either of those things, because it appears that your corporate culture is too hide-bound to consider those alternatives. Somebody, somewhere has decided that a monthly subscription fee needs to apply, and the huge up-front purchase price needs to apply, and that’s that. If you have to have a monthly fee, how about making it something reasonable, like $5/month/household, and it doesn’t matter how many TiVo’s I have?

I’m rooting for you, but only a little bit. I used to care about you, but now I don’t, because you’ve spent 8 years not caring about me. I wish you good luck, and I hope you figure out a way to survive. But, if you don’t, I will no longer be among those who mourn your passing, because while you had great engineering, your business side sucks. How about listening to your engineers, who I’m sure have been trying to tell your business folks all of this all along?

But, no, conventional wisdom says that engineers don’t know what they’re talking about when it comes to business. Er, except for Google, that is. And Microsoft. Oh, and HP, too.

But, what do they know?

Sincerely,

EngineerBoy

Dear prissy couple from my flight (and a desperate plea to airlines for offset seating)

EngineerBoy — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:01:49 +0000

Dear prissy couple from my flight (and a desperate plea to airlines for offset seating) is brought to you by CleverDonkey.com - ...Musings, Commentary, Opinions, and Drivel!

Typical US Airline Flight

I loathe and despise coach business air travel. When I travel personally, it’s usually with Marie, and we usually plan to make sure we can travel in comfort. You see, I’m 6’5″ and not svelte, and coach seating is not designed for me to fit in comfortably, and when we travel for pleasure we either wait until we can splurge on first class, buy a third seat so we have room, or make the best of sitting side-by-side.

However, when one’s company is footing the bill and you don’t have the flexibility that you do with personal travel, you get the seat you get and you have to make the best of it. You can try for exit row or bulkhead, but those seats are in demand and sometimes hard to get.

Lucky for me, on my most recent business flight I was able to get the exit row aisle seat both outbound and inbound. The flight out progressed without incident (thankfully), but as I boarded my flight home and approached my row, I noticed that the two inside seats were occupied by a couple, with the man by the window and the woman in the middle seat, meaning that my aisle seat would place me next to the wife.

Now, although I am a big guy, I can sit in such a way that I stay completely in my own air/leg/shoulder/butt space, particularly in an exit row where I can fully extend my legs. So, I resolved myself to spend 3.5 hours in my polite, curled up, as-motionless-as-possible seating pose, so that the lady next to me would not feel infringed upon.

As I sat down I could sense the woman was not happy about the situation…I mean, who would be? Even three normal-sized humans sitting side-by-side-by-side in a coach cabin is oppressively claustrophobic, and when one of the three is a big guy like me it just makes it worse. So, I understood her pained look at her husband as I sat down, and also understood his reassuring patting of her leg as if to say, “It’s okay, honey, I won’t let the traveling ogre squash you!”

So, I sat down, belted up, stuck my legs up under the seat in front of me, crossed at the ankles to keep my knees clearly in my own airspace and not in any way crossing over into her leg space. I folded my arms tightly, with the arm closest to the woman specifically tucked up as far as possible, so that I was clearly not infringing on her shoulder room, either.

I had also brought a couple of magazines to read, and when I pulled them out I held them with my arms almost fully extended in my lap, and when I turned the pages I did it with my arms fully extended so that my elbows didn’t bend and momentarily reduce her personal airspace. I also fully ceded the armrest to the wife so that she wasn’t too squeezed-feeling. Note that this is what I always do when I travel seated next to anybody but Marie, as I know that my large-tallness could be a burden to other fliers.

So, there I am, a big guy squeezed into a seat that isn’t designed for me, but contorted in such a way that I did not in any way cross over into the seating space of the woman next to me. On most flights similar to this, that would be the story – me contorted and uncomfortable, but otherwise flying without incident.

Well, not this flight. At first, everything was fine, or as fine as it can be in a coach sardine can. However, I then noticed that the woman, who was 5’5″ at best (and slender), had not only taken to sitting with her legs crossed, but crossed in such a way that they were crossed *towards* me, and not only that, crossed at an angle so that her foot was clearly extending over into *my* airspace. Really?!

I mean, she could have either a) easily not crossed her legs in such a manner that they floated into the legroom of the person next to her, or b) if she had to cross her legs in such a manner, at least do it in the direction of her husband. He, presumably, would mind a lot less than me, and he was maybe 5’8″ himself, so had plenty of leg room.

So her border aggression was pretty irritating, but I again took the stance that although she was being rude, I was still partially to blame for the uncomfortableness of the situation, given my height/size. In fact, I realized there might be a chance that she didn’t even realize what she was doing, and might have been subconsciously making sure to command her space, or something. So, I tried to let go of the irritation.

Then she picked up her book to read. And with almost every page flip, she elbowed me in the ribs. Only a little but clearly enough that she knew she was doing it. I’ll again state that I was very clearly completely on my side of the seat divider, and had ceded the armrest. But, this wasn’t enough for her, so she had to come past the armrest with each page turn and elbow me, even though she could easily have turned the page in a much less elbowic manner.

So, that’s how the flight progressed. Me sitting in such a way that I was contorted and remaining 100% on my side of the leg/air space of the seats, and her dangling her foot into my space and elbowing me when she turned her book pages.

W…T…F?

I resolved to just accept that I was flying next to a selfish, thoughtless human being, and although I found her behavior to be quite rude I still realized that me being a big guy contributed to the situation. I’m already stressed out enough when I travel for business, so I didn’t need to also marinate in a stew of bilious resentment towards the high-riding b*tch sitting next to me.

So, to the extent possible, I let it go and tried to relax…relax…relax…(rib poke)……relax…let it go…deep breaths…(leg kick)……………relax, dammit!!

And I did, I kept my cool and tried to get along as part of a society. Eventually I fell asleep. Note that this was done by fully extending my legs under the set in front of me, tightly crossing my arms in front of me, and lolling my head to the side away from Ms. Prissy Pants. And so I dozed off a couple of times like that, as comfortably as possible, but I’d nod off for a few minutes, wake back up (still fully balled up and not infringing her in any way), read some more, then go back to sleep.

During one of my bouts of sleeping, I was startled awake by the husband, let’s call him Mr. Prissy Pants, full-on kicking me in the legs as he tripped over me trying to climb over me to get out and go to the restroom. He not only kicked me, he kicked his wife, and half-fell into the aisle, clumsily grabbing the back of somebody else’s seat across the aisle and startling them awake, too. Now, through this flight I hadn’t slept for more than 10 minutes at a stretch, so it’s not like he had been blocked in by my long sleep cycle or anything. I’m also not deaf so they could have easily asked me to move, and the wife obviously had no social compunctions about elbowing me already, so she could have elbowed me awake and asked me to move.

But no, he decided to try to climb over me, a sleeping, 6’5″ guy wedged into his seat as tightly as possible, and then clumsily tripping and kicking me, and waking me up and also waking up the guy across the aisle.

His polite response to this? “Goddam it…fucking…shit…”

That’s it. Then he stomped off down the aisle to the restroom. No apology for a) kicking me and waking me up, b) waking up the guy across the aisle, or c) being stupid/rude enough to try to climb over me in the first place. I assume there was no apology for kicking the wife because she was already used to his rudeness, or something.

At this point I did get sort of a pained smile from the wife, which I took to be contrite, but nothing more than that. Also, she then immediately started shifting and squirming in her seat, like a 2 year old that has to go potty but doesn’t say so. I finally asked her, very politely, “Would you also like to get out?”. She said no, but she *clearly* needed to get up and go to the bathroom, too. So I said, “Well, I was going to stretch my legs anyway, so feel free…”, and with that I got up and moved forward in the aisle to clear a path. She immediately shot out of there and down the aisle.

I stood stretching my legs until they were both back in their seats. I got nothing from the husband, no ‘thank you’, no ‘sorry’, not even eye contact. Punk.

When the wife came back, she at least said a quiet little “thanks” with a pained smile. But that was it, and sullen silence the rest of the flight. The only good news was no more rib poking or leg kicking occurred.

I also noticed that, other than a logistical conversation as we were leaving (something like “where are the headphones?”, or something), the couple barely spoke a word to each other, although both were awake the whole flight, as far as I could tell.

So, maybe this couple was having some other problems, unrelated to air travel, that exacerbated the situation and/or their behaviors. Maybe. However, my gut feeling is that they were just a couple of rude, self-centered assholes who saw me as nothing more than an inconvenient lump that was further harshing their stonily silent travel.

At this point, I’d also like to make sure that the airlines get their fair share of the blame here. You see, they already know what size seats are comfortable for the cross-section of normal travelers – just look at the chairs in the gate area. The seats at the gate are by no means over-sized, but they are pretty much normal-sized, meaning that all of us waiting around for our flights can do so in relative comfort.

Now, I understand that I’m way over on the right-hand side of the bell curve when it comes to human sizing, and I don’t expect that airlines are going to make every seat large enough for me to be comfortable in. But, what I would like, and what they could do with minimal effort in my opinion, is to offer slightly larger seats for slightly more money. I, and I assume many, many, many other travelers, would happily pay an extra 25% for a seat that was 25% larger.

However, today the only option is to pay anywhere from 4 to 10 times the ticket price to get a First Class seat, which by my reckoning is about 25% larger than Coach. That’s ludicrous. The airlines have scrunched and scrunched coach seating until it’s finally at the point where even normal-sized humans can barely travel without extraordinary discomfort.

Another option is to retrofit airplanes with offset seating. Today, seats are configured side by side in a line, so that the part of most humans that is widest (shoulders) are lined up, creating the least amount of room between passengers. However, it’s possible to slightly change the arrangement of seats so that each seat is slightly offset from the other, meaning that each passengers shoulder goes behind (or in front of) the shoulder of the person sitting next to them.

More seats, more room, more comfort, more privacy. Come on, airlines!

Although it would be hard to prove, and I doubt there is such a thing as a retroactive patent, I have conjured this seating arrangement up on my own in my head over the years as I have spent countless hours contemplating the horror of US coach air travel (whilst traveling, of course). When I started writing this rant, I did some web research and found that this type of seating arrangement is already commercially available. The picture to the left is from the website of Thompson Solutions, for example.

First, I have to say that I love Thompson Solutions for creating these seat prototypes. Second, why the hell isn’t this type of seating being immediately adopted?!? Yes, I know there is an expense to retrofitting planes, but how about on new planes that are added to the fleets? How about starting to add offset seating to those?

The truth is that I really don’t need more room. I can be happy in a cramped space, as long as it’s not inhumane and doesn’t involve ongoing incidental contact with strangers. Offset seating provides exactly that. In fact, I’d rather slide into a human-sized tube, get it sealed up, and be stacked like logs when I take a flight, rather than have to deal with the current cattle-car arrangement.

One might respond that, in a free market, the customers decide what happens, and that if airplane travel were so horrible the airlines would be out of business. Or, a competing airline would spring up and use smart new ideas to steal market share. The problem is that, even though the airline industry has been ‘deregulated’, it’s not really a bunch of independent companies vying for market share on a level playing field.

Have you ever priced airline tickets? Isn’t it an amazing coincidence how so many independent airline companies manage to offer the exact same fares on the same routes? I mean, down to the penny – exactly the same. This means, of course, that the airlines communicate in some way on fare structure. Some might call that collusion, but I don’t want to get sued so I won’t.

Also, the major airlines have enormous control of gates at major airports. Just ask Southwest Airlines. They are probably the only real maverick airline, and they have been locked out of many major airports for a long time, because it’s impossible (or prohibitively expensive) to break the stranglehold that the larger airlines have on gates and flight times. However, slowly but surely Southwest expands their routes over time.

They are actually my one hope for the return of sanity to air travel. They’ve always gone their own way, and I could see them stepping up and doing something (like offset seating) to differentiate themselves further from the cattle-car airlines.

And to the prissy couple from above, and to all other fellow travelers, let’s please try to get along. Air travel is a necessary evil in today’s world, and we are all just trying to get from Point A to Point B with our luggage and sanity intact. I know there are rude people of all sizes, but let’s let them remain the minority. Let’s all keep our wits about us and remember that we’re all human beings, and that if we could afford First Class we would, and if we could avoid cramped coach travel, we would do that, too.

But the reality is that most of us end up traveling from time to time. As a requirement of our professions. To visit family. To seek medical help. To unwind on a vacation. To attend a funeral. And, as hard as it is to believe, very few people travel for the sole purpose of annoying their fellow passengers. We’re all on board for a reason, and if we have any anger or ire let’s direct it at the airlines for not offering us any realistic options, rather than sniping at each other.