CleverDonkey’s 2016 Rio Olympic Power Rankings

Posted on August 22nd, 2016 in Commentary,Engineerboy,Politics,Sports,Television by EngineerBoy
2016 Rio Olympics

2016 Rio Olympics

2016-08-21 Final Standings – Congratulations New Zealand!

The 2016 Olympics are history, and congratulations to New Zealand, who squeezed out a one point win to take the Olympic Power title this year! Hungary was a close second, with the Netherlands taking third, and with Azerbaijan, Great Britain, Jamaica, Denmark, Australia, Croatia, and Sweden rounding out the top ten.

The standard sortable chart is below, and I’ve added a graph of power ranking by total population below that here.

The purpose of these charts is to look beyond raw medal count – who cares if countries with hundreds of millions (or even billions) of people win a lot of medals?  They should win a lot of medals, right?  The big question is, which country is kicking ass, pound-for-pound?  The answer is in the table below.

The 2012 London and 2008 Beijing final rankings are also available, and are included as right-hand columns in the table below.

For reference: This table creates a weighted medal score by giving every country three points for each gold medal, two points for each silver, and one point for each bronze.  The country’s Power Rating is calculated by determining how many weighted medal points each country wins per 10,000,000 in population.  And to factor in economics, the population only includes those living above the poverty level (according to CIA poverty estimates).  Also, to eliminate the impact of outliers, countries with excessively large populations are capped at 300,000,000 and countries with exceedingly small populations have a floor of 10,000,000 for the purposes of calculation.

Come back here in four years when we’ll (probably) be doing this again!

CleverDonkey’s 2016 Rio FINAL Olympic Power Rankings
click column headers to sort up/down

2016 Rank IOC Code Country 2016 Power Ranking Gold Medals Silver Medals Bronze Medals Total Medals Weighted Medals Population (above poverty) 2012 Final Power Ranking 2008 Final Power Ranking
1 NZL New Zealand 35.0 4 9 5 18 35 4,709,044 26.0 16.0
2 HUN Hungary 34.0 8 3 4 15 34 8,359,373 37.0 21.0
3 NED Netherlands 27.1 8 7 4 19 42 15,475,907 25.4 23.8
4 AZE Azerbaijan 27.0 1 7 10 18 27 9,146,670 16.0 11.0
5 GBR Great Britain 26.0 27 23 17 67 144 55,343,500 26.2 18.8
6 JAM Jamaica 26.0 6 3 2 11 26 2,273,910 24.0 26.0
7 DEN Denmark 25.0 2 6 7 15 25 4,950,934 17.0 13.0
8 AUS Australia 23.2 8 11 10 29 56 24,141,810 28.7 41.6
9 CRO Croatia 23.0 5 3 2 10 23 3,373,489 13.0 7.0
10 SWE Sweden 21.0 2 6 3 11 21 8,509,604 14.0 9.0
11 CUB Cuba 20.5 5 2 4 11 23 11,239,004 24.0 34.6
12 KAZ Kazakhstan 16.7 3 5 9 17 28 16,812,280 18.2 15.8
13 SRB Serbia 16.0 2 4 2 8 16 6,425,346 6.0 4.0
14 BLR Belarus 15.0 1 4 4 9 15 8,900,282 24.0 32.0
14 SUI Switzerland 15.0 3 2 2 7 15 7,707,638 10.0 10.0
16 CZE Czech Republic 14.0 1 2 7 10 14 9,650,491 21.0 14.4
17 ITA Italy 13.2 8 12 8 28 56 42,526,551 8.7 9.1
18 FRA France 13.0 10 18 14 42 80 61,330,384 10.9 11.6
19 GRE Greece 13.0 3 1 2 6 13 6,949,132 2.0 5.4
20 GER Germany 12.4 17 10 15 42 86 69,096,411 12.3 11.3
21 BEL Belgium 12.0 2 2 2 6 12 9,612,950 4.0 5.0
21 GEO Georgia 12.0 2 1 4 7 12 3,378,123 12.0 12.0
23 KEN Kenya 11.6 6 6 1 13 31 26,744,066 8.9 15.4
24 CAN Canada 10.1 4 3 15 22 33 32,756,871 7.9 11.1
25 SVK Slovakia 10.0 2 2 0 4 10 4,742,544 5.0 14.0
26 KOR South Korea 9.7 9 3 9 21 42 43,226,956 15.0 16.3
27 ESP Spain 9.6 7 4 6 17 35 36,639,915 8.9 10.3
28 USA United States 9.1 46 37 38 121 250 275,233,065 22.5 8.2
29 ARM Armenia 9.0 1 3 0 4 9 2,036,668 4.0 6.0
30 UZB Uzbekistan 8.7 4 2 7 13 23 26,399,810 2.8 5.5
31 RUS Russia 8.6 19 18 19 56 112 130,180,075 15.5 11.6
32 SLO Slovenia 8.0 1 2 1 4 8 1,784,816 7.0 9.0
33 JPN Japan 6.9 12 8 21 41 73 106,544,610 7.0 3.8
34 UKR Ukraine 6.2 2 5 4 11 20 32,389,498 12.5 16.0
35 POL Poland 5.7 2 3 6 11 18 31,787,597 5.0 7.0
36 RSA South Africa 5.6 2 6 2 10 20 35,673,992 5.5 0.8
37 PRK North Korea 5.5 2 3 2 7 14 25,281,000 5.7 4.6
38 ROU Romania 5.2 1 1 3 5 8 15,412,136 12.0 10.6
39 BRN Bahrain 5.0 1 1 0 2 5 1,404,900 1.0 3.0
39 LTU Lithuania 5.0 0 1 3 4 5 2,754,902 10.0 7.0
41 CHN China 4.7 26 18 26 70 140 1,293,840,725 19.0 7.4
42 COL Colombia 4.5 3 2 3 8 16 35,236,270 5.0 1.3
43 BAH Bahamas, The 4.0 1 0 1 2 4 342,882 3.0 3.0
43 BUL Bulgaria 4.0 0 1 2 3 4 5,594,259 3.0 8.0
43 IRL Ireland 4.0 0 2 0 2 4 4,496,287 8.0 4.0
43 NOR Norway 4.0 0 0 4 4 4 5,223,256 9.0 21.0
47 ARG Argentina 3.6 3 1 0 4 11 30,513,280 2.5 3.2
48 CIV Ivory Coast 3.0 1 0 1 2 4 13,149,372 0.0 0.0
49 FIJ Fiji 3.0 1 0 0 1 3 598,230 0.0 0.0
49 JOR Jordan 3.0 1 0 0 1 3 8,178,209 0.0 0.0
49 KOS Kosovo 3.0 1 0 0 1 3 1,285,885 0.0 0.0
49 MGL Mongolia 3.0 0 1 1 2 3 2,429,106 7.0 10.0
49 PUR Puerto Rico 3.0 1 0 0 1 3 3,474,182 2.8 0.0
49 SIN Singapore 3.0 1 0 0 1 3 5,535,000 2.0 2.0
49 TJK Tajikistan 3.0 1 0 0 1 3 5,534,278 0.8 3.0
49 TUN Tunisia 3.0 0 0 3 3 3 9,425,468 5.8 3.0
57 MAS Malaysia 3.0 0 4 1 5 9 30,243,294 1.1 0.8
58 BRA Brazil 2.4 7 6 6 19 39 162,129,063 3.0 2.0
59 IRI Iran 2.3 3 1 4 8 15 64,587,566 4.1 0.7
60 TPE Chinese Taipei 2.2 1 0 2 3 5 23,155,737 0.0 1.8
61 THA Thailand 2.1 2 2 2 6 12 57,112,047 1.0 1.8
62 BDI Burundi 2.0 0 1 0 1 2 3,236,642 0.0 0.0
62 GRN Grenada 2.0 0 1 0 1 2 64,063 3.0 0.0
62 ISR Israel 2.0 0 0 2 2 2 6,661,980 0.0 1.0
62 NIG Niger 2.0 0 1 0 1 2 7,664,550 0.0 0.0
62 QAT Qatar 2.0 0 1 0 1 2 2,477,113 2.0 0.0
67 TUR Turkey 2.0 1 3 4 8 13 65,433,815 1.8 2.5
68 VEN Venezuela 1.9 0 1 2 3 4 21,068,487 1.5 0.6
69 ETH Ethiopia 1.8 1 2 5 8 12 64,913,028 2.4 3.3
70 MEX Mexico 1.4 0 3 2 5 8 58,324,447 1.3 0.8
71 ALG Algeria 1.3 0 2 0 2 4 31,108,000 1.1 1.2
72 AUT Austria 1.0 0 0 1 1 1 8,376,894 0.0 4.0
72 DOM Dominican Republic 1.0 0 0 1 1 1 5,934,202 4.4 5.0
72 EST Estonia 1.0 0 0 1 1 1 1,031,700 3.0 5.0
72 FIN Finland 1.0 0 0 1 1 1 5,491,817 4.0 7.0
72 MDA Moldova 1.0 0 0 1 1 1 2,814,055 2.0 1.0
72 POR Portugal 1.0 0 0 1 1 1 8,407,501 2.0 4.7
72 TTO Trinidad and Tobago 1.0 0 0 1 1 1 1,120,224 0.0 0.0
72 UAE United Arab Emirates 1.0 0 0 1 1 1 7,934,080 0.0 0.0
80 VIE Vietnam 0.6 1 1 0 2 5 82,224,900 0.0 0.3
81 EGY Egypt 0.4 0 0 3 3 3 68,344,077 0.6 0.2
82 MAR Morocco 0.3 0 0 1 1 1 28,904,250 0.4 1.1
83 INA Indonesia 0.3 1 2 0 3 7 229,471,335 0.3 0.4
84 PHI Philippines 0.3 0 1 0 1 2 77,356,514 0.0 0.0
85 NGR Nigeria 0.2 0 0 1 1 1 56,096,400 0.0 1.1
86 IND India 0.1 0 1 1 2 3 907,680,100 0.8 0.2

Note: I got curious as to whether the Power Ranking distribution was skewed by population, meaning, for example, did smaller countries tend to have higher rankings, or vice versa. So for my own curiosity I ginned up a chart that shows all countries that medalled from smallest to largest population (orange line), with their corresponding Power Rankings (blue bars). It appears to my half-trained eye that the distribution does not seem to trend along population lines, and confirms that the Power Ranking algorithm, while crude, appears to remove the advantage of population, which is one of the primary goals of this excercise:

Olympic Power Ranking by Population

Olympic Power Ranking by Population

Oat Flour Swedish Pancakes Recipe (gluten free and FODMAP friendly)

Posted on August 19th, 2016 in Engineerboy,Recipes by EngineerBoy
Oat Flour Swedish Pancakes

Oat Flour Swedish Pancakes

I’ve been making Swedish pancakes for years, but my wife has started leaning towards FODMAP friendly foods for health reasons, and wheat is definitely a no-no. I hated the thought of giving up on our traditional Sunday morning Swedish pancake family breakfasts, so I did some experimenting and came up with an alternative using oat flour, and, quite honestly, they taste even better than the wheat ones.

The key is getting the oat flour, what we do is buy Bob’s Red Mill Steel Cut Oats at our local grocery store, and then pulsate them in our Vitamix blender until they are of flour-like consistency. The steel cut oats are about the size of smallish rice grains, and blend into flour nicely. Some places also offer oat flour directly, so choose whichever works for you.

One note of personal preference in preparing these pancakes, I like using a 9.5″ crepe pan like this one. They’re made from iron, but aren’t as thick or heavy as a cast iron pan. They heat well and release easily with a little butter. And, full disclosure, I like that pan so much I bought a second one, and now I cook two pancakes at a time, which cuts prep time in half.

Now to the recipe, the ingredients are pretty simple:

Ingredients
1 cup oat flour
10 eggs
4 cups whole milk
splash of vanilla
2 tsp salt
butter for the pan

That’s it! Preparation is similarly simple, as follows:

Preparation
Heat the crepe pan – it doesn’t have to be super hot, but you want to let it fully heat to get even cooking. On my stove I set it at the third notch up out of seven total, and let the pans heat while doing all the prep work.

Also, and this is optional, put an oven-safe plate in the oven on it’s lowest setting to begin heating. This plate will be used to hold the pancakes and keep them warm on the table.

Combine the oat flour and milk and blend them on medium high until fully combined. Note that the oat flour takes longer than wheat to combine, so make sure to give it enough time. If it doesn’t fully combine, you may end up with some oat silt leftover in the bottom of your bowl after making your crepes, it won’t really hurt anything, but you may have to experiment to get the blend time correct here.

Once the oat flour and milk are combine, add all of the remaining ingredients (not the butter, that’s just for cooking) and blend for a minute or two on medium-low, just to combine them.

Put a pat-and-a-half in the heated pan, let it melt, and swirl it to cover the entire surface of the pan.

Use a standard soup ladle to put one full ladle of batter into the pan – it should spread out over the entire pan to between about 1/8″ and 1/4″ in thickness, about half the thickness of

Garlic and Onion Clarified Butter Recipe

Posted on August 16th, 2016 in Commentary by EngineerBoy
Savory Nectar of the God

Savory Nectar of the Gods

My wife follows the FODMAP diet, and two of the big no-nos are garlic and onion, specifically the solid parts of both – she’s okay to have the oils and juices. The other day I was making an omelette and in order to give it some flavor without adding physical bits of onion and garlic, I first sauteed some garlic and onion in butter, then strained out the solids and cooked the eggs in the now-flavored liquid butter.

It then occurred to me that I could create this garlic onion butter in advance, and even have it be clarified for easier cooking. It may be TMI, but the entire family did NOT suffer from the usual digestive secondary effects of garlic and onion eggs, but we still got the nice savory flavor. Your mileage may vary, but if you have digestive issues with garlic and/or onions but you like cooking with them, this might be an alternative worth trying (I am NOT a doctor!)

This post details the recipe and shows the process, as follows:

Ingredients
2 lbs salted butter
3 tbsp chopped garlic
1/2 smallish sweet onion

Preparation
Slice the onion into thin slices, but no need to chop finely
Add the butter, garlic, and sliced onion to a sauce pan and place on low heat, for reference on my stove it would be Low-and-a-Half
Do not cover the pot
Let it simmer for 2-3 hours, stirring gently every 45 minutes or so
Note that the golden butter you see here is after 2 hours, if you let it cook for 3 hours it will be a bit darker with a stronger flavor
Set up a strainer over a bowl, with a (preferably white, not dyed) paper towel lining the inside of the strainer
Pour the cooked mixture into the strainer, including all the onions and garlic from the bottom, and allow it to drip/drain for a few minutes to get all the good stuff into the bowl
Remove and discard the onion and garlic in the paper towel (although I’ve been thinking there might be some secondary use for them at some point)
Allow the clarified butter to cool down a bit, 15-20 minutes, then pour into a mason jar – the cool down period is to prevent cracking the jar (which I have done in the past when in a rush)

That’s it! This stuff doesn’t go bad in any short-term period of time, and I leave it out on my counter or in a nearby cabinet (not refrigerated) for use when cooking. NOTE: I am not a food scientist nor a health inspector, so use your own judgment as to whether you’re comfortable not refrigerating this stuff! 

This stuff is great for cooking – clarified butter is more like cooking oil, it’s much more heat tolerant than regular butter, and with the garlic/onion infusion it adds a great savory taste to foods cooked in it. It’s also FANTASTIC warmed up

Possible Trump Candidacy Outcomes

Posted on August 3rd, 2016 in Commentary,Politics by EngineerBoy
Trump Outcomes

Trump Outcomes

Disclaimer: the article below represents the noodlings of a dumbass who is talking about things way over his head, but which he nonetheless finds interesting as a mental exercise.

At this point, I think it’s clear that the results of the 2016 US presidential race will be extraordinarily strange, and that strangeness primarily comes from Donald Trump’s candidacy. His campaign has been unlike any in my lifetime, and he’s certainly been a unique major party candidate.

As November approaches, I can’t help but consider the possible outcomes, as follows (from most to least likely, in my opinion):

Trump Drops Out: I think the most likely scenario is that Trump will realize he can’t win and so drops out of the race because that prevents “losing”.  Also, he’d never come right out and say that he’s dropping out, he would wrap it in some kind of faux drama, like:

Has a business deal going that is too big to pass up, but it would be a conflict of interest to continue his candidacy
The fix is in and he’s not going to play along in a corrupt system
Some kind of family drama (wife having issues, kid sick, etc)
Assassination attempt (real or contrived) and he quits for the good of his family
A mysterious walking away and steadfast refusal to explain, with hints of a nefarious cause

Trump Stays In, Loses: It’s possible that even if he sees he won’t win he’ll stay in to the bitter end, most likely culminating with lawsuits and the launching of TrumpTV.

Trump Concocts a Legal Challenge, Delays the Election: He’s got floors full of lawyers who make their living off of Trumpian litigation, he could spin up some kind of legal challenge that causes a friendly court to stay the election until resolution (and/or virtually certain reversal by SCOTUS).

The Republican Party Disavows Trump: In order to try to preserve and rebuild their brand, the Republican party could choose to disavow Trump as their candidate, and possibly even run an alternate candidate. This move would virtually guarantee a win by Hillary, but the Republicans might see it as necessary for cutting their losses and reducing the damage to their party in the long term.

Trump Runs Third-Party: If the Republicans disavow Trump, or he senses it is imminent, he could spin up a third-party candidacy in order to try to remain in the race.

Trump Stays In, Wins: I think at this point this is an unlikely, but not impossible, scenario. It would, in my opinion, require a Clinton scandal of incredible proportions to swing the momentum at this point. If he does win, I’d expect him to either resign before the first term was done, or be impeached and removed from office.

As per the disclaimer at the top of this post, I’m just another dumbass with a blog spouting nonsense. However, this election is going to be different from any in my lifetime, and however it ends it’s going to be with a bang.