2005 Golden Globes Fashion Report

Posted on January 1st, 2005 in Fashion by mynagirl

Click here for the CURRENT YEAR’S Golden Globes Report

This is the 2005 report.

Likes:

Angelica Huston was gorgously wonderful in a simple long black dress with loads of diamond necklaces. It was a great look, sumptuous and very sexy.

Mariska Hargitay once again looked stunning in Vera Wang (also her choice for the Emmys), this time in a medium pink silk column with ring detail at the shoulder.

Glenn Close in a beautiful black Geoffrey Beene, worn to honor him (he recently passed away).

Jennifer Garner was classy in a bright red gown; whether or not she chose that color to synchronize with the release of Elektra is anyone’s guess.

Kim Raver from 24 looked great in a pale yellow chiffon wrap Carmen Marc Valvo (but then again I’m super-partial to this guy, seeing as how every fancy gown I own is Carmen Marc Valvo). She accesorized with a gorgeously long and sparkly triple-looped necklace — very nice.

Emily Rossum looked radiant in a white gown although I never got a good look at it.

Eva Longoria was quite elegant in a black Oscar de la Renta.

Kerry Washington from Ray was just knocked-out in a turquoise Narcisso Rodruiguez. She deserves props for dressing so elegantly at her first awards show.

Dislikes:

Joely Richardson in a too-pale aquamarine column, neck-cutting scarf, and too-severe hair bun.

Halle Berre in a mis-matched breastpiece gown.

‘Oh My God’s:

Melina Kanakaredes in a don’t-you-like-my-flat-stomach revealing gown. I guess her red silk keyhole from the Emmys just wasn’t racy enough for her. I swear, that gown is a reject from the Miss America pageant.

‘Oh My God’ Worst of the Night Special Honorable Mention:

Diane Kruger’s horrific gold lamé … towel wrap? (I’m not sure I can call it a dress). A terrible two-piece nightmare: too tight up top, showing flesh on one side, and in general, looking like she should’ve been tending bar at the Luxor. This is why I give props to Kerry Washington for looking so elegant and pulled together at her first awards show — because this is what happens when you aim to stand out.

The Coverage

As a side note, I of course switched from the E! coverage to the TV Guide channel… red carpet coverage just isn’t red carpet coverage without Joan and Melissa. However, it just wasn’t the same type of coverage as E… you couldn’t really see anyone’s dress — I think maybe they didn’t have enough booth space? The coverage seemed a bit disorganized: you could see less famous stars heading up the stairs and then slinking back down as Joan said, no we’re waiting for so-and-so, so they didn’t have handlers ahead of time making stuff work smoothly. It also seemed like a lot of the big stars didn’t really stop by, it seemed. Plus, because it is still the TV Guide channel, they still had to have a “what on what channel” ticker crawl going the ENTIRE time. Very irritating. Reluctantly, I switched over to E to be able to actually see the dresses and get the bigger stars. Hopefully by the next awards show TV Guide will be able to get their show together, because Joan and Melissa are definitely the ones to watch, but TV Guide as an organization doesn’t have it together yet.

BalanceBall Chair by Gaiam (Highly Recommended!)

Posted on December 1st, 2004 in Health and Fitness by mynagirl

So, if you know what an exercise ball is (think like what you’d use in Pilates), you can start to picture this chair. It’s best viewed, here, on the manufacturer’s site:

http://www.gaiam.com/retail/product.asp?product%5Fid=95-1004

A coworker suggested this to me last year after I mentioned my back injury from a few years ago (bad disc, never healed) and my constant un-preference for 8 – 12 hours of computer work in a normal office chair. I hemmed and hawed for the past year about maybe buying one of these funky contraptions, and in the past month or two really seriously considered it after regular office chairs just began causing me too much pain during the day. I even managed to snag a spare “exec” office chair at my office to try and abate the back pain, but it was no better after a day of constant work at the computer and then more hours of sitting at home in a similar office chair: my back would ache and I was pretty miserable by the end of the evening.

I did all the research about buying one for a while, trying to figure out if it was going to be tall enough for me. I’m pretty tall (5’11”) but I like my chairs to sit high, and the description of the chair says it’s good for someone 5′ to 6′. That’s a pretty big range, in my book. I did call the manufacturer and they said that the height of the ball is 25″ off the ground when the chair is assembled. I measured that against the height of my regular office chair and, allowing for the squishiness of the ball when a grown human sat on it, figured I could live with that.

My dad, sweetie that he is, got me one for Christmas because I’d talked about it so much. When it arrived, we realized I needn’t have worried about the height — it comes with 3″ extender feet that can be screwed into the casters to give the chair extra height (I’ll point out that this was mentioned nowhere on the website, however). The chair came within just a few days after my dad ordered it from Gaiam, and it took Engineerboy about 10 minutes to set it up. The ball has to be inflated partway and then let sit for a few hours and then inflated the rest of the way.

So now to the important part!! So far the chair is great. Aside from not putting too much pressure on your rear end, part of the major concept of the chair (as I understand it) is that you “actively sit” all the time. First of all, it sort of makes you sit up straight… it’s not impossible to slouch in this thing, but it’s much a more natural posture on the ball to sit up straight. So you’re working your abs and back muscles naturally while you sit which (just like in physical therapy) hopefully leads to a healthier back. Second of all, you kind of bounce while you sit, so you don’t just sit and get rooted into one (painful) place. I haven’t had it very long yet but I really like it so far over my $199 OfficeMax office chair.

Two other functionality notes: (1) the ball is uncovered. It’s that sort of thick texturized rubber. I was a little worried it would pick up pet hair, either through static or texture (so far it hasn’t), and I think it might be funky-feeling next to bare skin. I don’t think it will be a problem for me because I don’t generally wear shorts in the house. (2) the casters have locks on them to prevent the wheels from rolling if you want them to. So far in the two days of functionality testing they’ve proved remarkably easy to accidentally flick downward into the locked position with my heels. Since I work at home on a hardwood floor and constantly roll back and forth between two laptops, this is not my preferred configuration for the chair. Currently I seem to be constantly dragging one wheel that’s in locked position that I didn’t mean to be that way. A small annoyance but I mention it nonetheless.

If you’re interested in obtaining it for yourself, it’s sold on several other sites besides Gaiam.com, including Target / Amazon, Fogdog, and Drugstore.com, although Gaiam sells it for the lowest price from what I’ve seen and the shipping was fast, so might as well get it direct from the source. If you have any back issues or even if you’re just tired of you’re regular office chair, at $70 it’s a pretty darn good solution.

Budweiser’s New Football Ads Promote Cruelty to Animals

Posted on November 11th, 2004 in Commentary by mynagirl

Originally published 9/26/2004, updated 11/11/2004.

Anheuser Busch is back again this football season with its corporate advertising philosophy that Animal Cruelty = Beer Sales. Last year we had the distasteful Bud Light ad where Cedric the Entertainer was wooing a girl in a limo and the girl puts her tiny dog on the lid of the pop-up cooler. The cooler lid pops up, the poor dog sails up through the open moon roof and then hurtles back down, missing the moon roof and landing cruelly on the roof of the limo with a whimper. I emailed Anheuser Busch about the inappropriateness of that ad at the time and received a very tepid email in response about how they felt the ad was humorous to their audience.

Well, perhaps I only encouraged them. I can hear the advertising brainstorm session now: “Gee, if a woman doesn’t like it, maybe we’re doing something right!” Maybe they didn’t believe me when I said Engineerboy hated it, too. Because this year they’re back with more Cruel Animal Ads! Two cases in point, plus an added bonus I just recently discovered:

  • A man, without telling his girlfriend*, takes her tiny Pomeranian* to a Frisbee-catching competition. The dog, too tiny to really hold onto the Frisbee, tries anyway and ends up being hurtled spinning through the air by the Frisbee instead of being able to really catch it. Then a large Doberman comes along and catches the poor Pomeranian in its jaws. The poor pitiful Pomeranian whimpers as it’s caught in the Doberman’s mouth. Let me emphasize something here… a Doberman’s jaws could easily kill a dog as small as a Pomeranian. An ad such as this isn’t engaging in funny hyperbole or make-believe, it’s disgusting cruelty… and for what… to sell beer? (*Editor’s notes: I recently re-saw this ad and realized that his girlfriend does know that he entered her dog in the contest, but she doesn’t approve. And for those of you who may have read the earlier version of this article, the dog was originally mis-identified by me as a Pekinese, but I got a write-in that it’s a Pomeranian).
  • A football referee has made a bad call during a football game and he’s being mercilessly yelled at by one of the coaches. The commentator describes the event by saying that the referee is being “beaten like a rented mule”. What a horrible, horrible turn of phrase! Who would possibly okay that in the script for this commercial? Aren’t there a million other things they could’ve picked for that there, other than referring to someone horribly beating an animal?! Isn’t that a fabulous phrase for the company that does all those majestic ads with those beautiful Clydesdales? Why not make fun of retarded people, maybe, or the homeless? Maybe we could make jokes about a particular racial group… that could be real fun. I’m thinking that would be a real step forward for Budweiser. And, to top it off, at the end of the commercial, it shows the referee at home being yelled at mercilessly by his wife and she mentions how the cat litter box hasn’t been cleaned out for three weeks. So it’s good to know we’re not only cruel to large animals, we’re callous and uncaring toward our housepets at Anheuser Busch, as well.
  • Recent addition!A new Bud Light ad also has a window cleaner making windows so clean that a bird flies into it and knocks himself out. I swear they really can’t come up with anything they consider funny unless it involves hurting an animal.

Well, whether or not Anheuser Busch and the advertising morons at Budweiser believe women are football fans, or whether or not they think they buy beer (I do occasionally, mostly at baseball games but occasionally at dinner or out at a bar), this particular set of consumers is no longer going to buy anything from the Busch companies. If I need to buy a nice cold beer from the vendor at Minute Maid Park, it’ll be a Miller Lite. If I get a beer at a bar, it’ll be a Shiner Bock or a Harp. And since Anheuser Busch owns Sea World, I’ll probably give that place a pass in the future. I sure hope those animals are treated better than the poor animals in the Budweiser ads.

The thing that amazes me is that in this world filled with creative people, Anheuser Busch can’t come up with any better way to sell beer. Miller Lite has some hilarious new commercials out now that don’t involve any casual cruelty to animals — the referees that come into the everyday situations and throw penalties are pretty funny (“Uh oh, definite unibrow. That’s a no second date penalty.”) Those are clever and aren’t hurting anyone besides a little male ego, and that’s fair game during a football commercial, as far as I’m concerned. I think Budweiser could stand to learn a few lessons.

Wimbledon (***)

Posted on September 6th, 2004 in Movie Reviews by mynagirl

I had pretty much written this movie off my possibility radar — I really like Paul Bettany (those of you who don’t recognize him might remember him from A Beautiful Mind or Master and Commander, playing second violin in both to Russell Crowe) but I can be hot and cold on Kirsten Dunst. Normally she’s okay, but the ads for this movie looked a little too sappy chick-flick, and it looked like her character was just a little too simpering for me.

However, in looking for a good post-dinner-and-coffee film with a girlfriend the other night (we even went jewelry shopping, so I guess we were looking for a chick flick), Wimbledon lined up correctly in the genre/theatre/timing category and there we were. Boy, was I pleasantly surprised! I was expecting at best a guilty pleasure and at worst a cringe-worthy moosh-fest with all the worst that Hollywood can serve up (so to speak) in a romantic comedy. Although I guess maybe it isn’t “Hollywood” crafting this movie, since it came from the team that put together Four Weddings and a Funeral and Notting Hill, both clever and decidedly British comedies. I should’ve had more faith in that pedigree!

First of all, Wimbledon was much more of a Tennis Movie than I was expecting. Bettany’s character is Peter Colt, whom the announcers (great cameos by John McEnroe and Chris Evert Lloyd, by the way) constantly refer to as a ‘journeyman tennis player’: a relatively unknown Brit who’s been to Wimbledon 13 times, currently ranked 127th at 31 years of age, although in his younger days he was once ranked as high as 11th. He’s decided this is his last hurrah at tennis; he’s old (for a tennis player) and ready to retire to reluctantly become pro of a local club where he can be ogled by the rich old ladies in their tennis whites. His status in the tennis world is so marginalized that even his announcement of retirement is lost as the reporters turn to interview another younger, hotter player who enters the room during the press conference.

To make this in part a Tennis Movie, the filmmakers actually make excellent use of something I normally dislike — the athlete-psyching-himself-up-while-performing voice-over. Because they introduce it right from the beginning and it’s used consistently throughout, it actually adds to the movie rather than being a pesky fly buzzing at me during an otherwise enjoyable scene. And it makes the movie very much about the character of Colt and his tennis odyssey.

Well, not entirely. Enter Lizzy Bradbury, the young (but hopefully not too young, since Bettany’s character is 31) hot American tennis star. A mixup in hotel keys upon arrival at the Wimbledon’s primary hotel leads to Peter seeing Lizzy in her shower, and she seeks him out for flirting on the practice courts and private dates in her hotel suite after that. Cue standard pleas to keep their dates private from her overly-focused father, played by Sam Neill and said father inevitably finding out and menacing Peter to not distract his daughter from her game.

Peter and Lizzie’s little affairs, of course, end up rejuvenating Peter’s tennis game, and the journeyman player ends up being an unexpected hope for Britain in Wimbledon. Peter’s agent (a marvelously funny turn by Jon Favreau) begins speaking to him again after two years as Peter is hot property at the old age of 31. None of the major arcs in the story are exceptionally groundbreaking, but the minor details often go in unexpected directions and keep you interested: Peter Colt’s family is an interesting cast of characters, and a verbal conflict between Colt and a tennis rival doesn’t resolve in the stereotypical way you might expect.

All in all, it’s just a touch more than a lighthearted piece of fluff. It still has all the romantic comedy elements if that’s what you’re looking for, but the writing was just a shade above standard Hollywood schlock, and I really enjoyed it. I think even the guys might dig it. Jewelry shopping ahead of time not required.

Mynagirl’s Fashion Report on the 56th Emmy Awards, September 2004

Posted on September 2nd, 2004 in Fashion by mynagirl

In general, there were no really horrific messes this year and not too many standouts. Mariska Hargitay wins top honors for best dressed at the Emmys in a gorgeous, gorgeous, absolutely classic outfit – a beautiful apple green Vera Wang column dress-and-a-train complete with a tropical flower in the hair. She just glowed and looked every inch the classic Hollywood goddess. (I guess being a newlywed helped, she was just smiling the whole time as well).

For the most part I liked:

  • Heather Locklear’s wine-colored goddess dress
  • Portia Di Rossi’s classic Givenchy with great Diane Von Furstenburg jewelry.
  • Marlo Thomas’s classy white column as she accepted her father’s Bob Hope Humanitarian Award.
  • Drea de Matteo’s beautiful and slightly renaissance-looking black and gold frock.
  • Kim Catrall in a simple but fun pink Pamela Rowland – her overall look was just so simple and effortless.
  • Jennifer Anniston’s gorgeous white tube dress from Chanel with a very Indian gold design.
  • Cheryl Hines in an absolutely gorgeous Norma Linay teal beaded chiffon halter.

I found very blah:

  • Laura Linney’s black knee-length Prada frock.
  • Sarah Jessica Parker’s unspectacular yet somehow fussy black ankle length Chanel couture.
  • Amber Tamblyn’s too-old-for-her garnet-colored fishtail gown.
  • I almost-liked Debra Messing’s beautifully cut and colored beaded gown, but it was a bit too short for her (and quite see through on the backlit Red Carpet).

I thought the following were horrible!! I officially want to outlaw keyhole gowns.

  • Cynthia Nixon’s unflattering brown jersey sheath with a ropes-of-turquoise necklace. Even Engineerboy noticed it was less than Emmy-worthy: “What’s with that turquoise?? Did she hold up Phoenix at gunpoint??”
  • Mary Louise Parker’s “Hooray for Boobies” brown keyhole dress.
  • Edie Falco’s unflattering black Randolph Duke tulle over beige going in several directions at once.
  • Melina Kanakaredes’ red silk keyhole gown – not even bias cut!
  • Patricia Heaton’s wacky multi-colored Elie Saab… the drape and cut were nice and fairly flattering on Patricia’s body, but the colors were just a little too out-there for me.
  • Jane Kaczmarek’s custom made weird Randy Rohm (sp?) dress … she really does make some strange choices. It had some weird embroidery and beading. If she had this custom made, that makes it even stranger for me.

Best Moments from the 56th Emmy Broadcast, September 2004

Posted on September 2nd, 2004 in Television by mynagirl

This year’s Emmy awards offered a reality-show theme while skewering the format, with the wry smile and funny jokes that only Garry Shandling can deliver. It was such a joy to have him back in the driver’s seat, I really couldn’t wait for the show to be on, and I wasn’t disappointed. This year’s telecast offered some truly hilarious moments.

Great acceptance speeches:

  • Michael Imperioli accepting his supporting dramatic actor for The Sopranos: touching, thoughtful, and brief. Others could learn from him.
  • Drea de Matteo, too flustered to remember who to thank, just said she’d get off the stage before she started to “cry, choke, or puke”.
  • Kelsey Grammer’s speech, paying respects to John Ritter while also graciously signing off after 20 years of playing Frasier Crane.
  • Meryl Streep, accepting for Angels in America. She epitomizes the first lady of american acting, showing off the cuff humor and wit. “There are some days when even I think I’m overrated… but not todayyyy!”

Moments of weirdness:

  • Chris Noth’s strange marriage proposal to Sarah Jessica Parker. Was that scripted? If so, it was reeeaally lame.
  • Allison Janney convincing Mariska Hargitay to come up onstage with her during the Best Actress in a Drama acceptance speech.
  • Elaine Stritch’s acceptance speech… what a riot!! She might be my new favorite… whatever the hell she is!!

Moments of hilarity and great quotes:

  • All of Garry Shandling’s opening monologue.
  • The director of the Oscars accepting his Emmy while directing the Emmy broadcast from the control booth, including cutting to his parents sitting in the audience – completely adorable.
  • “I’d like to sing this now, if I may”. Mitchell Hurwitz, finishing off the tail end of his acceptance speech as the get-him-off-the-stage music begins to play.
  • “Alright, I have no jokes on Iraq cause I thought we’d be done by now.” –Shandling
  • “Don’t you know God? Couldn’t we have gotten a better joke than that?” Zach Braff to Amber Tamblyn after their scripted joke fell rather flat.
  • “Drea, killing you was the hardest writing I’ve ever had to do.. .and this is coming from someone who wrote on ‘The New Adventures of Flipper’”. –Terence Winter, winning for best writing on The Sopranos.
  • Conan O’Brien: “Joan Rivers couldn’t be here, she’s out protesting High Definition TV”.
  • And the all time best Emmy Moment: the spoof commercial for reality TV series “What’s In Front of Garry’s Door?” with David Duchovny reprising his role from the Larry Sanders show playing David Duchovny as a smitten paramour complete with a spanking ping-pong paddle. I laughed so hard I thought I was going to quit breathing. Brilliant. Freaking brilliant.

Miss America 2005 (*)

Posted on September 1st, 2004 in Television by mynagirl

So, I have to admit, I always watch Miss America if I track that it’s on. It’s a spectacle of pure schmaltzy Americana that is truly impossible for me to pass up. The combination of fashion (or what passes for it on the pageant circuit), the opportunity for me to make bitchy comments (see previous parenthetical note), and how American women wrestle with their femininity in a decidedly unfeminist contest is like catnip to a girly girl and holder of a sociology degree. This year I had no clue it was on but was just closing the browser window for TV Guide when I saw Miss America pageant in the listings and got it queued up on TiVo just in time.

Of course, this is one of the new and weird Miss America pageants that they have now, where they rejigger the format every year to desperately try and please the audience that’s disappearing or doesn’t even bother to show up in the first place. But if this is a modernized Miss America, it’s just horrible. The music and lighting when they announce the ‘winnowing down’ rounds on the ABC telecast is straight from Who Wants to Be a Millionaire. The bikini competition (c’mon, none of the all-too-toned girls are gonna hurt their chances and wear a one piece) is sponsored by Speedo — the host mentioned Speedo’s name twice and the bikinis have a Speedo logo on the back of the suit (it’s a small logo, but it’s there).

New to the competition this year (or at least I don’t remember it, and boy do I think I would remember something this awful) was an awkward strutting casual wear competition. The girls start by being lined up and vogueing behind white screens — honest to god, they vogued behind backlit screens — it was so strange and embarassing. Then, one by one as their names were called, each made another quick vogue-y pose and came out on the runway for about 20 seconds like some kind of America’s Next Top Wal-Mart Model. I guess the girls were told to “act more natural” or “be themselves” or something, because they each girl did weird non-pageant-y things like shimmy her boobs or flip her hair with her hand while kicking up a heel to one knee. I mean, no one quite did the Elaine Benes thumbs-and heels-out dancing, but it some of it was really painfully non-choreographed and weird. Accompanying this strange parade were contestant voice-overs telling cute stories about bowling with nephews or how her mom gives her cookbooks as a good luck gift before each pageant.

The swimsuit competition sinks to a new low. Aside from the Speedo (TM) sponsored all-bikini factor (although I think Miss Arkansas would’ve worn a g-string if they would’ve let her), the actual live competition was preceded by five minutes of a pre-show swimsuit “shoot” footage. The girls were poolside, surrounded by candles with toes dipping in the pool water. With the girls smiling seductively, talking about staying in shape, and leaning forward seductively, and the camera monitor visible in some frames, the entire setup looks so much like a Playboy shoot it was very creepy. When the live bathing suit competition finally started, it began with a strange little choreographed dance on stage with all 52 contestants intermixed with more scenes of the pre-recorded stuff from earlier by the pool set to weird clubby rock music. The strutty part of the competition was the standard stuff, girls in bikinis and heels. At least Miss New York was shaped like a real person and walked like a normal person (she actually looked like she enjoyed it and didn’t have that weird plastic smile), but alas didn’t make it into the Top Five so I guess “weird plastic smile” is actually what the judges are looking for.

The evening wear competition was more standard Miss America fare, but In general, I just really lament that some of these women don’t really know the meaning of “formal wear”. Miss Alabama’s idea of formal wear looked like something out of Frederick’s of Hollywood. Yes, I understand that you want to show the judges that you have a well toned body, but isn’t that what the bikini section is for? Her outfit was two pieces and the skirt was slit up to the upper thigh. At least Miss Louisiana was in a dress that looked like something that someone might actually wear to, say, a charity gala (albeit one in New Orleans). Then again, Miss Two Piece Alabama won the formal wear section, so apparently taste isn’t really a factor, it is how much skin you can show, and this is why no one is beating down my door to be a pageant consultant. What really dropped my jaw weren’t the fashion choices, however, but the fact that the show producers played the video clips of the same audio clips that they played during the casual wear competition. This was especially annoying…surely they could’ve figured out getting two different snippets of ‘personality’ from these girls? They sure didn’t seem to repeat any shots of the girls frisking around by the damn candlelit pool for the bikini competition.

On to the more re-vamped portions of the show. The quiz show aspect was added a few years ago and provides some interesting insight into the knowledge of today’s young women. There are only a few questions, but it’s interesting to see what questions they do and don’t get (and which one’s I can and can’t get — it’s not like I got all questions right, either). I really like this addition to the pageant, actually — it’s not subjective judging and it’s a chance for the women to prove their knowledge of American history and current events. I mean, if the top prize is a scholarship, after all, it does seem to make sense that part of it should depend on some actual knowledge.

The biggest change in the pageant this year is that the three runners-up were announced ahead of time and the two finalists went “head-to-head” in talent competition. This provided the dual benefit (from the producers’ perspective) of being able to pretend that talent is one of the most important deciding factors and only having to show the actual talent performance of two of the competitors. Miss Alabama sang (always a popular choice with the judges) and Miss Louisiana did an uneventful tap dance. Miss Alabama eventually won the crown, although she was one of the least dynamic girls there, in my opinion.

In general, I’ll keep watching every year, although I feel the pageant slipping more and more into the morass that’s enveloping TV in general these days. The host was from The Bachelor, and the cheesy dramatic music is sort of dorky but I guess what should I expect… it is still a pageant after all. The swimsuit competition is looking more like Temptation Island, though, and I think the producers are really making a mistake by taking the pageant in that direction. I think classier would definitely go over better and increase viewership and ratings over the long haul. But then again, what do I know? I’m just a viewer, and I watched this year, didn’t I?

M. Night Shyamalan’s The Village (***)

Posted on August 1st, 2004 in Movie Reviews by mynagirl

It’s hard for me to know how I’d like this movie, or any of Shyamalan’s movies, if I hadn’t first seen The Sixth Sense. You’ll have to bear with me as I preface my comments for The Village with a few about Sixth Sense and the rest of Shyamalan’s oeuvre. I was so irritated with that movie right up until the ending that brought the whole story together that I then became an instant fan of this director, willing to give him so much leeway in any story, to let him lead me where he wanted. I gave Unbreakable that same kind of “okay, where are you taking me today” wide-eyed wonder, and I ended up liking that one, too, even though it is oddly paced and weird in its own way. I liked Signs, too. I know a lot of people objected to a member of an advanced, space-traveling alien race being able to be trapped in a kitchen pantry, but a modern army paratrooper would be similarly trapped if caught without any of his conventional weapons. See? Sixth Sense was so brilliant I’ve just been willing to go along with whatever else has come out from the director since. And I know that’s so many people’s big beef with Shyamalan, that his first movie was brilliant, and that either (a) the other movies don’t live up to the first shining promise of Sixth Sense, or (b) Shyamalan’s got the movie going public hoodwinked with his emperor-wears-no-clothes Hollywood cachet. And it is hard to judge what I’d think of his other movies if it hadn’t been for his first one, and The Village is no exception.

It’s also hard to discuss this movie without discussing plot spoilers, and I’m going to break a normal rule here and talk a little bit about plot. So:

*************PLOT SPOILERS AHEAD****************

The movie, like all Shyamalan films, makes repeated use of color. Unlike previous works, however, it’s more than just a thematic element. In The Village, the residents of an early 1800’s hamlet lead a semi-idyllic life of self-contained sustenance. They farm, school and raise children, and marry one another within a few square mile area surrounded by woods. The villagers and their houses are swathed in drab colors; anything bright red is hidden or forbidden. At nighttime, the men of the village stand guard at the perimeter of the village land near the woods in ochre yellow cloaks, warding off an unseen (and, in the beginning of the movie, very nebulous) menace. Village residents are not allowed into the woods, and residents of the woods are clearly not friendly toward the villagers. Red is forbidden because it attracts the menace from the woods

As the movie progresses, the central conflict becomes a need for one of the characters to travel through the forboding woods to “the towns” on the other side, something that the elders took an oath they would never do when they founded the village. The acting is quite good here; Bryce Dallas Howard is wonderful as the youngish woman entrusted with this task, and Joaquin Phoenix is also excellent opposite her. As for the rest of the cast, William Hurt and Sigourney Weaver are also quite solid. I know some reviewers took exception to Oscar-winner Adrien Brody ‘deigning’ to play a mentally challenged man in this film, but I thought he was great and that the film was worth of his performance. There’s a hell of an emotional scene between him and Bryce Dallas Howard that was very difficult for me to watch.

I really did like The Village, but it had one flaw for me. The main disappointment for me was that there wasn’t anything supernatural or extraterrestrial in this film (Engineerboy made me use the word extraterrestrial here — he pointed out aliens don’t qualify as ‘supernatural’ in the movie Signs, although if you really remember the plotline Mel Gibson’s character sort of had spooky premonitions from his dead wife, so I think that qualifies, but whatever). The movie was still good, but I was looking for that extra Shyamalan weirdness, and all my little frissons of expectation (“oh man, I can’t wait to see what those turn out to be”) as the plot progressed didn’t pay off at the end. I still really loved the film, and I think the director is still a genius, but that one element was missing for me.

Cafe Le Jadeite (****)

Posted on May 9th, 2004 in Restaurant Reviews by mynagirl

Cafe Le Jadeite

1952 West Gray

Houston Texas 77019

713 528 4288

After work the other Friday night, Engineerboy and I each craved Chinese food. There are, of course, several Chinese and Vietnamese food destinations within striking distance of our office and home. However, I have many non-food requirements for a chill-out-after-work dinner destination, especially after the end of a grueling work week. I especially like cushy seating (you’ll notice that as a theme in many of my restaurant reviews), and I like a little “see and be seen” atmosphere somewhat on a Friday, especially if I like my outfit :-). So some of the corner Chinese food joints, even if they have good food, just don’t quite cut it for the “indulge yourself” attitude at the end of the work week.

But we didn’t know where to go that fit both our culinary jones and my ambiance requirements. We drove aimlessly through River Oaks and I spotted Cafe Le Jadeite. “Wait! Isn’t that Chinese?” I exclaimed. “Um, I don’t think so,” said Engineerboy. “I think it’s French.” “No, no. Jadeite. That’s Chinese. Plus, look at those horses,” I said, referring to the Asian sculptures outside the glass doors. We decided to give it a try. The management had even helped us out by posting their menu outside the restaurant in glass (which is actually a quite French thing to do) and it was decidedly Chinese in flavor, but not exclusively so.

As soon as we were inside, I knew we’d made the right choice, at least from the non-food aspect of what I was looking for. The interior was unbelievable, truly River Oaks fabulous: custom etched glass panels, more giant horse sculptures, other unreal decor I don’t have a language to properly describe. Absolutely beautiful. The staff was formal but not stuffy, and led us to the perfect booth with wonderfully cushy seats, crisp linens, and hand polished flatware. We ordered a pair of drinks from their custom drink menu; they were shortly delivered by two folks who shook them up and poured them from individual shakers into chilled glasses right there at the table. I knew I was at the right restaurant, alright.

Well, if you’re wondering about the food quality after the promise made by the décor and service, it actually surpassed them. It was amazing. Our meal consisted of:

Appetizer:

Duck crèpes with hoisin sauce and fresh scallion (shared). We snarfed these down. They were so fresh tasting and light. The duck was so tender, Engineerboy said he was wishing he’d ordered the duck as a main course.

Soup course:

Asparagus lobster soup. Engineerboy says he loved it.

Pumpkin seafood soup. Unbelievably light, with just a little cream. So tasty!!

Main course:

Shrimp with garlic and mushrooms. Very tasty and delicate.

Lightly fried shrimp on apple ginger sauce (house specialty). Unreal, so good I could not believe it. The sauce was sweet but not overpowering at all, and it was the perfect complement to the shrimp.

We skipped dessert (we were stuffed), and the whole bill, drinks included, only set us back $80 before tip. I’ve had meals that weren’t 1/4 that good for that much money (Ragazza comes to mind). The service was so amazing (one Diet Coke was delivered so quickly I thought maybe they were using ESP): the word that I keep thinking about is effortless. They knew how often to come by, when we needed everything, and they were friendly but not overbearing. The whole experience was fabulous and exactly what we needed. Cafe Le Jadeite is definitely the recipe for what ails at the end of a long work week!

American Idol 2004 Weekly Scoreboard: Fantasia Wins!!

Posted on May 2nd, 2004 in American Idol by mynagirl

This is 2004’s American Idol page. Click here to see the American Idol 2006 Dashboard!! This week:

The impressively sized Kodak theatre may have gotten the better of Diana DeGarmo. Both divas got to sing three songs — two of their own choosing, and one written by former Idol contestant Tamyra Gray. I was disappointed that both sang songs they’d previously sung in prior competitions, however. I was really looking forward to something new and different that I hadn’t seen and heard before. Was this something the producers enforced for some odd reason? If so, boo hiss. I wanted something fresh!

Diana:

Her songs were okay but not great. She led off with the Tamyra Gray song, and she did a good job with it. Her other two songs, No More Tears (the Donna Summers tune) and another torchy number, were good and shaky, respectively. I think she really got rattled, either by the pressure of the event itself, by the size of the auditorium, or both. Her last song she went terribly off key for a few notes, and I’ve never heard her do that in any performance before. She didn’t really bring it the way she’s done in the past three or four weeks, however.

Fantasia:

Her first song, which I didn’t recognize, was really awkward and choppy. She sang it well, I guess, but it didn’t ‘gel’. As Randy would say, it was just ahight for me. Her second song was a repeat performance of Summertime, from Porgy and Bess, right down to starting her performance sitting side-saddle on the floor. Boring.. didn’t we see this about 7 weeks ago?! Her performance was unreal, however. She really is a riveting singer. She finished off with the Tamyra Gray song. I intially thought Fantasia might’ve made a strategic error, choosing to go second, especially since she and Diana were going to have to sing the same song. I should’ve had more faith in her decision. She did a phenomenal job with that song, and singing it second only highlighted how much style she brings to her performances, as well as what a great voice she has.

Prediction

Fantasia.

The Results

Fantasia.

Unfortunatly, for the first time this whole year, I did not get to watch the show (alas, my TiVo and I were parted and I haven’t watched it yet). I, of course, did finally get the results via CNN and was relieved to see that the better performer won. I myself had voted for Fantasia, although I didn’t go into the final competition with preconceived notions of who I was going to vote for. I truly was going to vote for whoever gave the best performance, although truth be told if you look over the course of the entire comptetion, Fantasia is a better overall singer, performer, and artist. Diana is wonderful, and I think she can sing the heck out of stuff, but Fantasia puts some real guts into what she sings. It’s hard to believe there are only three years separating the two. Maybe it’s motherhood, but Fantasia seems like she’s got 15 years on Miss DeGarmo. Plus, I would really rather buy a record put out by Fantasia, I think — she’s more my style of singer.

So, ultimately, I think the right decision was made, and I think a star was recognized. I’m very happy for Fantasia and I can’t wait for her album to come out. I’ll buy it. Congrats to Bobo.

American Idol 2004 Who’s Been Voted Off So Far:

Week Voted Off In Trouble
Week 1 Leah LaBelle Jennifer Hudson
Amy Adams
Week 2 Matt Rogers Camile Velasco
Diana DeGarmo
Week 3 Amy Adams LaToya London
Jennifer Hudson
Week 4 Camile Velasco Jasmine Trias
Diana DeGarmo
Week 5 John Peter Lewis John Stevens
Diana DeGarmo
Week 6 Jennifer Hudson LaToya London
Fantasia Barrino
Week 7 John Stevens George Huff
Jasmine Trias
Week 8 George Huff Jasmine Trias
Week 9 LaToya London Fantasia Barrino
Week 10 Jasmine Trias —
Week 11 Diana DeGarmo —
« Previous Page — Next Page »