My Neti Pot Experience

Posted on October 12th, 2008 in Engineerboy,Health and Fitness by EngineerBoy

NOTE:  I am not a doctor and this post is simply me relating my personal experiences.  Consult with your doctor before making any health-related decisions or taking any health-related actions.

Update 10/12/2008 – It has now been TWO YEARS since I’ve had any type of cold, flu, sinus infection, or sore/scratchy throat.  Two years, clean as a whistle, and it’s due almost completely to using the neti pot whenever I feel a tickle/cough coming on, plus using it once a month regardless.  Original article is below, from 12/2/2007.

Neti PotStarting in my mid-20’s (I’m mid-40’s now) I began having recurring respiratory issues.  I considered them to be “colds”, as I was coughing and stuffy with a scratchy throat.  A few times it was bad enough for me to drag myself to the doctor.  Twice it developed into bronchitis.  But, in general, I’d do the Dayquil/Nyquil shuffle for 2-10 days and slog through it as productively as possible.  These events would occur anywhere from 2-6 times per year, with varying intensity.

About a year ago it happened again and I decided that I’d leave my “cold” untreated and see what happened, as I had grown tired of dosing myself with potions.  Predictably, it got worse and worse, and then one morning I woke up and found that all of my upper-teeth were aching and sore.  Some quick web research revealed that this was highly indicitave of a sinus infection (note that none of my previous doctor visits had ever included the diagnosis of a sinus infection, acute sinusitis, chronic sinusitis, etc).

I went to the doc and got some prescription meds that helped knock it out.  The silver lining, however, was that I finally understood that I was getting sinus infections and not “colds”.  Bad on me for not figuring it out sooner, but now my enemy had a name – “sinus infection”.

I’m a fairly logical and pragmatic fellow and I’m not usually easily fooled by hype or marketing or anecdotal evidence.  However, the more I read about the use of neti pots, the more it sounded logical and intriguing.  For those unfamiliar, a neti pot looks kind of like a small plastic or ceramic teapot.  You fill the pot with lukewarm water and salt, and then you stick the spout into one nostril, lean over, and pour the liquid into your sinus cavities, as it drains out the other nostril.  You then switch positions and pour from the other nostril back to the original one.  More info can be found here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neti_pot

So I acquired a neti pot and salt/baking soda and gave it a try.  The bottom line is that I have not had a sinus infection (or cold/flu) in the past year.  I use the neti pot for nasal irrigation whenever I get a scratch/tickle/runny nose, and also use it once a month regardless.  Note that there are people who claim to use it daily, but that just seems overboard, to me.

Since my 20’s I had not gone a year without at least a couple head-clogging, brain-slowing, ass-dragging sinus infections, so going a year without one is statistically significant (at least to me).  If/when I get another one I’ll post here, but based on my experience thus far I don’t expect to, as each time I’ve gotten the old familiar tickle/scratch in my throat, the neti pot has knocked it right out.

I have found that the pre-mixed packets with salt and sodium bicarbonate work the best for me – they can be found (along with pots) on Amazon or elsewhere on the web.

A Voter’s Lament

Posted on October 9th, 2008 in Commentary by EngineerBoy
And this, too, shall pass away

The world will little note, nor long remember, these two chumps

The 2008 US Presidential Election is a month away.  We are approaching the end of nearly two years of constant campaigning by a dwindling pool of potential candidates, and we are down to the final two.  And I have to say, if these two represent the absolute best that America has to offer, we are in a sorry state indeed.

One is a self-described “maverick” who nonetheless has decided to pander to the most intolerant and extreme elements of his constituency, whom he had previously ignored.  The other is a self-described agent of change who picked at 6-term Senator as his running mate and who has professional lobbyists working on his campaign delivering his message of “no lobbyists”.

These are our choices?  Obama or McCain?  One’s too old, the other’s too inexperienced, and neither are natural born leaders.  Obama is certainly articulate, McCain can be folksy, but neither of them come across as speaking from the heart, and neither appears to be able to inspire the American people with their “greatness”.  Say what you will about Bill Clinton, but the man could connect with and inspire people in his sleep (and often did).

Now, they’re both Senatorial material, but that’s it.  Presidential?  Not in the least.  Great leaders?  No.  Bad people?  No, not bad.  Both are politicians, which means they are professional liars, but within the realm of “politicians”, they are two of the least repugnant.

But if our primary criterion for Presidential candidates is lack of repugnancy, then we’re doing it wrong.  We, the people, have allowed the political process to devolve into a game of “gotcha”.  Your grandparents prayed to the wrong god?  Gotcha.  Traded in your first wife for a newer model?  Gotcha.  Didn’t wear a lapel pin?  Gotcha.  Have an occasional hot temper?  Gotcha.

We hold our candidates to superficial standards that don’t allow them to be human beings, and we ignore their actual character and leadership abilities.  Real people are imperfect, but in order to become president one must hide imperfections and appear angelically pure.  That means that, to become president, one has to lie about one’s self.  And we, the people, eat it up with a spoon and end up electing the best liar.  Is it any wonder that things continue to go downhill?

It would be easy to blame the media, because acting as the fourth estate is supposed to be their job, and they are woefully, laughably lacking in the area of serious political journalism.  However, it’s we the people who have allowed the press to become infotainers, and it’s we the people who flock to 24 hour news channels that have to drum up SOMETHING exciting each and every day to hold onto our eyeballs.  And it’s we the people who are happy to be lazy, hypnotized consumers of pre-processed opinions.

We, the people.  The people of the United States of America.  *We* control the government of this country, not vice-versa.  We could vote all of these bums out in one round of elections, and elect real Americans who are real patriots with real ideas to solve real problems. 

Really.  All it will take is for the apathetic majority to rise up and take action.  I’m one of those guilty of apathy and inaction.  For years I recused myself from the process, because that process rarely, if ever, produces worthy candidates.  So I sat smugly in my ivory tower and looked down upon the hoi polloi as they listened to tales told by idiots, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing, and congratulated myself for not playing in a crooked, broken game.

But that time is over.  We, the apathetic majority, need to rise up and once again demand accountability from our government, and if they won’t give it and the press won’t ferret it out, we need to *take* it with the power of our votes.

Aren’t you tired of this endless game of political bullshit?  Wouldn’t you love to be inspired by true patriots and leaders, even if you didn’t agree with 100% of their positions?  Don’t you want to have our adversarial system set up so that the “other side” are our opposition, not our enemies?

Well, I do, and I intend to use the tiny, almost imperceptible power of my lone vote to do what I think is right.  I encourage you to do the same, because together we, the apathetic majority, can change things for the better. 

And remember, step one is to clean house, to change the litter box of democracy, to throw the bums out and start fresh with different candidates with diverse ideas and creative solutions, who actually care about America and Americans, not just about re-election and lining their pockets and those of their cronies.

I’m prepared to feel like I’m wasting my vote, but I can no longer do nothing, and I cannot bring myself to acknowledge that either of the two current candidates should be my president.  So I’ll vote for whomever I think is the correct person, and I encourage you to do the same. 

The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step, let’s take it together.

Did John McCain Pick Sarah Palin In Order to Lose?

Posted on October 5th, 2008 in Politics by EngineerBoy

Okey-dokey, thanks...but no thanks.

I have a theory that John McCain picked Sarah Palin with the express purpose of losing the election.  There can be no other explanation.  This is a woman that he had met only once before naming her as his running mate.  Nobody in the lower 48 had ever heard of her, and as we learn more about her the choice by McCain seems more and more insane.

This is a woman who can’t name a Supreme Court decision, or name a newspaper or magazine that she’s read regularly, and I’m beginning to doubt she can see Russia from her house.  She is so unequivocally unqualified to be Vice President that it’s like we’ve entered an alternate dimension where they’re holding a bizarro-election.

There is no way that her selection has helped the McCain campaign or the Republican party.  It smacks of the Bush administration tactic of breaking any and every law of the land with impunity, right out in the open, and not only not hiding it, but flaunting it and claiming that it’s not only not wrong, but it is in fact right.  And that’s the spin they’re putting on her selection – that she speaks to the everyday Americans, the Joe Sixpacks and Hockey Moms out there who need representin’.  And we all know that if there’s one demographic that is near and dear to the heart of the Republican party, it’s the lower middle-class.

There is simply no way the choice of Palin was made for the purposes of winning the election.  The only explanation I am left with is that John McCain does not want to win this election.  That begs the larger question of…why?  Why wouldn’t he want to win?  I’ve found his campaign to be disappointing, because he seems to have eschewed his actual maverick credibility and become a pandering nincompoop.  He does not appear to be the John McCain that I expected in this race.

Well, what if what he’s doing is falling on his sword in order to protect us from another Republican administration?  What if he got into the Republican primaries without any expectation of winning, but only to stir things up and bring his actual true maverick sensibilities to the party platform?  And then, oops, he won – now what?  He may even know, or at least feel, that he’s too old at this point to be President.  If that were the case, he’d need to make sure that his VP selection was someone not only qualified to be the veep, but also qualified to be President, given the increased probability that his age/health will render him incapable of serving his full term.

Did he do that?  No, he did the exact opposite.  He picked someone who doesn’t even appear to be qualified for the job she has, much less qualified enough to leapfrog to a heartbeat away from the Presidency.

In fact, he picked someone who will almost certainly ensure that he does not win in November.  Maybe this will turn out to be his final heroic, maverick act – thumbing his nose at the Republican party by sabotaging his campaign and their quest for a permanent Republican majority. 

Bless you, John McCain.

Idiocracy (***½)

Posted on October 5th, 2008 in Movie Reviews,Politics by EngineerBoy
We Are Not Men

We Are Not Men

Idiocracy is the latest film by Mike Judge, who also created Office Space.  It was released in 2006, playing in only a handful of theaters with no advance publicity of any kind, and it quickly made the jump to DVD.  However, if there is any movie in recent memory that SHOULD have played endlessly at the multiplexes of America, it was Idiocracy.

As we here in the United States drown in a downward spiral of reality TV, processed foods, bombastic advertising, mindlessly large corporations, zombified workforces, and borderline retarded elected leaders, Idiocracy perfectly describes the water with devastatingly funny, sadly accurate satire and wit.

The story revolves around Joe (Luke Wilson), a current-day soldier who is selected, along with Rita (Maya Rudolph), to participate in a year-long human hibernation study.  However, while they are in stasis, the people in charge of the super-secret study are arrested for unrelated reasons, and Joe and Rita are forgotten about – for 500 years.

When they awaken they are greeted with a future where Joe, initially selected for his averageness, is now the smartest person in the world.  You see, as the movie explains, with no natural predators man has not evolved to favor the most intelligent problem solvers, man has instead evolved to favor promiscuity and dumbness, because that combination leads to the most babies, and the absence of poverty, disease, hunger, or hardship means that those offspring continue to survive and reproduce, causing human intelligence levels to decrease with each passing generation until mankind has reached the point where it can no longer maintain the technology of society, and the collapse of civilization is imminent.

One example of this devolution is that a huge company has signed an exclusive agreement to replace the water in the nation’s water supply with their sports-drink, called Brawndo.  So, everywhere you go the water fountains and faucets supply Brawndo instead of water.  Unfortunately, even the portions of the water supply used for agriculture are replaced with Brawndo, and nobody in the dumbass future understands that plants need water to grow, so there is a looming food crisis.  All this is fostered by ubiquitous advertising which claims that Brawndo’s got electrolytes, which is what plants crave.  Joe, of course, is confused by the ubiquity of Brawndo, and the future-doofuses simply mock him for wanting to drink “toilet water”, as apparently the only place water is still used is for flushing. 

It actually takes a while for Joe to figure out how long he’s been frozen.  When he first wakes up he’s confused and doesn’t feel well, so he stumbles into a hospital for help.  After a reasonably revolting medical test, he meets with a doctor who gives him his diagnosis that:  “…it says here on your chart that you’re all fucked up, you talk like a fag, and your shit’s all retarded.”  Indeed.

Also, in the future most people have at least one brand name as part of their full name – for example the diagnosis above is given by a Dr. Lexus, and Joe meets and befriends a “lawyer” named Frito Pendejo.  Also, current actual brand names are used throughout the movie, in some cases with surprisingly unexpected evolutions of their primary products and/or advertising.  For example, Carl’s Jr.’s slogan is “Fuck you, I’m eating”, an idiocratic evolution of their current slogan of “Don’t bother me, I’m eating”, Costco stores have grown to the size of cities and a greeter greets each customer by saying “Welcome to Costco, I love you”, and the Fuddruckers chain’s name has evolved from Fuddruckers to Futtbuckers to Buttruckers to, finally, Buttfuckers.

Joe’s relative hyper-intelligence is finally recognized, and he is tasked with “saving the world” by President Dwayne Elizando Mountain Dew Hector Camacho, who makes him Secretary of the Interior.  Joe is reluctant to take on the task, as in his own mind he’s no genius, so at the first opportunity he slips away to try and find the rumored “Time Masheen” that will let him go back to his original time and place, and back to his safe, ordinary, averageness.

In restrospect, it’s easy to see why the studio didn’t put much effort into promoting this film.  First of all, so many huge name-brands are skewered here that any revenues could have easily been lost to lawsuits (Starbucks giving handjobs?!).  Also, the target demographic for major Hollwood movies are the typical dumbasses in the typical multiplex, and this movie would have insulted them (if they could even have understood it) by pointing out to them that they are the seeds of the downfall of humanity, if for no other reason than the fact that their lack of discriminating taste put “300”, “Shrek the Third”, and “Alvin and the Chipmunks” in the top 10 highest grossing films for 2007 (really).

It’s also easy to see that this film was released by the wrong studio – Fox, to be exact.  If it weren’t for slack-jawed dumbasses who are slavishly influenced by advertising, who are hypnotized by slapstick violence, and who lack the ability to think critically, the Fox empire wouldn’t exist.  Even Fox is smart enough to know that you don’t make money by insulting your constituency.

And this brings us to the drivers that prompted this review, two years after the release of the film.  First and foremost, the film is incredibly well done and funny as hell.  But second, and more importantly, I think that this film has precisely described what is going on in America today, and shows us the logical (if exaggerated) conclusion if things keep going the way they are.  At the risk of sounding elitist, I have a reasonably high IQ and am reasonably well-read and knowledgable about the world, and while this movie made me laugh, it also, upon reflection, scared the hell out of me.

In my lifetime I’ve seen a lot of progress by mankind and I’ve always had an optimistic view of the future – not that I expected things to become perfect, just that overall, bottom-line, after factoring in all the successes and failures, we as a society would tend to make progress towards a more enlightened, safe, and enjoyable future. 

However, it’s beginning to feel that we’ve peaked, and are now starting a downward slide.  Superstition, dogma, and ignorance are not only supplanting logic and reason, but are being embraced and promoted as positive values.  Our political process has become such a farce that it feels more like a reality show competition than a quest to find the greatest possible leaders.  Seriously, I can’t think of a single political leader in my lifetime worthy of respect and awe.  In fact, I can’t think of one who wasn’t wildly deserving of scorn and derision.  Even the ones who come close to being true leaders are obscured by the fact that the political machine marginalizes them into impotence, and they wave their tiny fists in the air and squeak like caged mice, all with the best of intentions, but all for naught.

In the end, We the People are to blame for our situation.  We could, in one single election year, throw out each and every bum currently in office and replace them with true thinkers and leaders.  But we don’t.  We could, with only a little effort, choose to live within our means and spend our hard-earned money on quality products from ethical companies.  But we don’t.  We could, with just a little backbone, ensure that each and every child in this country gets a rich, full, well-rounded education.  But we don’t.  We could, with a little introspection, choose to idolize great thinkers, great artists, great writers, great inventors, and people of great character instead of the constant stream of vapid, artificial celebrities-du-jour.  But we don’t.

And we could choose to stave off the coming Idiocracy, by fighting against the encroachment of ignorance and complacency into the realm of reason and ambition.  I try to do that, each and every day, and although sometimes it feels like a lonely task, I know that there are others out there doing the same thing.  Know that you are not alone.

Oh, and watch Idiocracy, it’s fucking hilarious, scro!

The $700 Billion Financial Bailout Failed – Good!

Posted on September 29th, 2008 in Politics by EngineerBoy

Just Say No

Today, the US House of Representatives voted against the proposed government bailout of US financial institutions.  Good.  We have a mostly free marketplace, and the less government intervention the better.  Yes, the government should set the rules, and perhaps even adjust them every great once in a while.  What the government should NOT be doing is constantly tweaking the rules and then bailing out the losers simply because they happen to be large.

Having the government artifically control the marketplace is…well…communism.  And we all know how well that has worked, historically.  It’s easy to understand why the government feels the need to do something – if they don’t, and the natural market corrections occur, many people will feel a lot of pain.  And most of those people will also be voters, and injured voters tend to react by throwing out whoever is holding the hot potato when the music stops.

And the music is definitely stopping.  After years and years of reckless financial policies, major institutions are finding that their worth is now based on undercapitalized loans to unqualified borrowers on overpriced assets.  Historically, we had regulations that prevented our large financial institutions from leveraging themselves so unwisely, but those regulations have been eroded over the last decade or so, and now the bill has come due.

And the bill must be paid, no doubt about it.  However, the bill should be paid now, by virtue of natural market corrections (with the associated, short-term pain) rather than through government bailout money, which can only lead to a solution that is, at best, inefficient, and, at worst, rigged to benefit the politically powerfully.  Personally, I trust the capitalist marketplace more than I trust the Federal government when it comes to the free market.  The government’s job is to set up a level playing field, but then not interfere in the game.

Can you imagine the outrage if, with four minutes to go in the Super Bowl, the NFL announced a bunch of rule changes, applicable immediately and designed to impact the outcome of the game in progress, simply because the team they preferred wasn’t winning?  Say it was the Dallas Cowboys versus the Baltimore Ravens, and the NFL desperately wanted Dallas to win because it would mean much higher fan interest and revenues for the following seasons, and Dallas is behind with 4 minutes to play.  So, the NFL announces that the Cowboys can immediately gain access to the Ravens full playbook, and listen in on all their called plays and headset communications.  Oh, and the Ravens have to bench their top offensive and defensive players, and their head coach has to spend the last four minutes of the game in a sound-proof isolation booth and can’t communicate with any of his players or coaches.

That would be outrageous.  But that’s what they’re trying to do with this bailout.  Every financial transaction is like a bet, at some level.  Every time you hear of a sell-off of shares, remember that there are exactly the same number of shares being bought as are being sold.  And when a person with some spare capital chooses to invest it via an investment bank instead of stuffing it in their mattress or buying government-backed T-bills, that investor has made a bet that the risk of losing that money is worth the potential for a higher return.  Well, those investors have lost their bets, and the government is coming in and trying to rig the game at the last minute.

Now, if the story is actually that the financial institutions (perhaps in cahoots with our elected officials) perpetuated some kind of criminal fraud on the American people, and the government is trying to redress that crime, that’s a different story.  But, first, announce that it is a crime, indict and arrest the criminals, put them in jail (not minimum-security country clubs), and then work to redress the victims. 

However, if this is simply a matter of greedy investors and ignorant loan-signers, then I say let the (blue) chips fall where they may.

Framing and headerboards – nice!

Posted on September 22nd, 2008 in Remodeling by mynagirl
Hey, now we have the bones for a bar -- no more wall!!

Hey, now we have the bones for a bar -- no more wall!!

So check this out!  We have a headerboard that goes across the span, and the makings of a half-wall / bar in our new footprint!  How great is that?!I didn’t really get to help as much as I wanted — what with the vapors, I was pretty miserable and Engineerboy was really worried.  I did eventually feel well enough to help, so I was doing light work like drilling holes and putting screws in but Scott was watching me like a hawk in case I decided to keel over.  It was like This Old House meets House!!!  😀
Anyway, I’m quite proud of our (Engineerboy’s) job, the headerboard is absolutely level, which is pretty impressive considering our house is old enough that “straight lines” are more memories than realities.  And now it’s like our whole house has opened up — well, except for all the crap in the way that we had to move out of the way that’s now in the middle of the dining room.  But we’re undaunted; that stuff is headed for storage bins and the storage area.
Prettiest headerboard you ever saw... earlier in the day before the studs got removed.

Prettiest headerboard you ever saw... earlier in the day before the studs got removed.

Hi Mom.  Does the wall being gone help us get fed faster or anything?

Hi Mom. Does the wall being gone help us get fed faster or anything?

Now we get to build out the bar and tile it!!

Day Two: Learning What’s Under There

Posted on September 20th, 2008 in Remodeling by mynagirl

So Project Wall Remove proceeds.  It’s funny that we moved out of the Houston Heights into Brenham, only to be embarking on a quintessentially Heights-ian project of remodeling our 2/1 tiny bungalow on an undersized lot. 

The rerouted wiring behind the kitchen wall.

The rerouted wiring behind the kitchen wall.

Today was spent with rerouting wiring (Engineerboy), cutting through wall (Engineerboy), and removing about 1 zillion nails (Mynagirl).  Oh and shop-vac’ing the hell outta the inside of what-used-to-be-a-wall.  (Including spider eggs, yuck!!) 

We learned that the kitchen floor is higher than the dining room floor because the kitchen has 3-count-them-3 layers of linoleum layed down on top of one another.  And there’s plywood underneath the 3 layers of linoleum on top of the subfloor in the kitchen.  I don’t know why, because it’s the same subfloor as in the rest of the house I think.  Maybe there was damage to the subfloor about 15 years ago before the first layer of linoleum went down?  Maybe there used to be carpet in the rest of the house?  Unknown, but I can tell you that Project #2 is going to be replacing that damned crappy floor.  It’s all torn to hell. 

Here's what underneath there...

Here's what underneath there...

Here's the wall that will be gone tomorrow

Here's the wall that will be gone tomorrow

We had a heck of a decision on the part of the wall that’s still abutting the west outside wall — the side that goes beneath the cabinets is just plywood, which I think is sort of tacky, but there’s really nothing to be done to it since it goes behind the cabinets.  And we’re not replacing the cabinets — they’re actually pretty solid.  So we had to decide if we were going to mess with that wall.  In the end we decided not to, and bought a RotoZip to cut into the plywod wall with a precise depth, pretty sweet.

Tomorrow is header board and sawing through the studs… sweet.

Liposuction on a Pig — The Remodel begins

Posted on September 19th, 2008 in Remodeling by mynagirl
Our sweet little cottage

Our sweet little cottage

One of the funny things about buying a “starter” home or a “fixerupper” is that it’s hard to get started. 
 
I can go with the flow in a lot of areas and be perfectly happy with temporary fixes, but when it comes to things that are permanent I don’t like to just make a hasty decision.  Nor do I like to make a cheap one.  Permanent things are worth a little money to get the thing that makes one’s soul smile a little.  Especially when it’s something as integral to your everyday life as your home. 
 
But it leaves me a bit poleaxed.  I mean, if the wall is crappy thrice-painted paneling with plastic trim, do I really want to slap another coat of paint on it just for the sake of a little color?  There are no “little victories” in the aesthetic realm of a starter cottage like this.  The engineering side of the house gets to do little miracles constantly and can make things infinitely better with a magnetic door stop or a click-just-right-to-get-only-one-square paper towel holder.  But finishing touches on a house that needs to be gutted and redone?  Lipstick on a pig just won’t do it.  Liposuction is more likewhat the doctor ordered. 
 
So now compound that hesitation with the daunting logistics of doing reconstruction in a tiny house.  Because, well, if we knock out that wall, where do we put the stuff that’s there right now?  If I start this particular project, how long will I be taking my morning shower with the hose in the backyard?  How long can we live without a stove?
Here we go!!!

Here we go!!!

This line of thinking ended today. After endless hemming and hawing and two years of living with industrial-spray-gun-flat-white wall paint, a bathroom counter with (ugh) cigarette burns on it from the previous owners, and chipped linoleum (the list goes on), we decided to do the big before the little. And down came the wall with that unmistakably satisfying squeak of nails lifting from two-by-fours via crowbar leverage. Ahhhhh!

Scalpal, nurse! Or maybe just the sledgehammer

Engineerboy took prybar to dining room wall (my mom may disown me for this, but we don’t even own a sledgehammer) and proceeded to easily rip off the paneling with gloved hands. Next came down the cheap plywood on both sides. There was no drywall to speak of — that’s right, that wall in our kitchen is just painted plywood. Or it was!! Now the tiny assholes-and-elbows kitchen will get to expand lazily into the “dining room” which currently serves as a place for a toolchest, a sideboard full of computer hardware, and an overstuffed set of flimsy corner shelves from Wal-Mart that look like they’ll crater if they have to hold one more polical commentary tome or Unix Sys Admin manual. We envision a nice “open plan” with a breakfast nook-y type feel and space for one person to chit-chat while the other cooks.
Oh yeah.  Destruction.

Oh yeah. Destruction.

Next goes the why-build-a-free-standing-closet-in-the-middle-of-the-house.  Which might actually let us use the floor space currently wasted on the 1940’s-era “telephone nook”.   Stay tuned.

I would swear there was a wall here a minute ago.  Now where did I put it....

I would swear there was a wall here a minute ago. Now where did I put it....

Hamlet 2 (***)

Posted on August 30th, 2008 in Movie Reviews by EngineerBoy

Rock Me, Rock Me, Rock Me Sexy Jesus!

Hamlet 2 is one of those movies that you simply don’t (and can’t) expect, and I mean that in a good way.  Is it a satire on inspirational teacher movies?  Yes.  Is it a parody of great-but-misunderstood-artist movies?  Yes.  Does it mock innocent-white-girl-falls-for-tough-chicano-gang-banger?  Yes.

Does it insult Tucson?  Yes.  Does David Arquette’s character say less than 10 words in his running cameo?  Yes (approximately).  Does Elisabeth Shue have a small part?  Yes.  Who does she play?  Herself, working as a nurse at a Tucson hospital after burning out and leaving Hollywood behind. 

Does the inspirational teacher go on an acid trip?  Yes.  Is Catherine Keener both a) looking her age and b) still damn sexy?  Yes (pay attention, Hollywood and actresses).

Is there a song in the play-within-the-film called Rock Me, Sexy Jesus?  Yes (see photo, above).  Is it funny in spite of the fact that it sounds like it would be stupid?  Yes.  Is there a song in the play-within-the-film called Raped in the Face?  Uh, yes.  Is it as bad as it sounds?  Uh, yes…and no.

So, if I were reading this review, this is the point where I would probably tune out and go look for some other movie to watch.  However, I would end up missing out on a very original and funny film.  However, the description above sounds like it could be describing a painfully juvenile, unfunny schlock-fest.  Well, this film has all of those elements, but it *knows* it has those elements, and it mocks those elements before turning them on their head and…well…er…raping them in the face, I guess?

Anyway, the basic storyline centers on a high school theater teacher named Dana Marschz (Steve Coogan) – the last name is pronounced “marsh-z”, like the word marsh, but with a tiny, quick little zzz sound tacked onto the end.  Coogan plays Marschz as a sort of bastard love child of Tiny Tim, Eric Idle, Pee Wee Herman, and Weird Al Yankovich (try not to visualize).  His story is that from the time he was a young boy in Canada he wanted to act on the stage, and he pursued his dream in spite of the objections (and molestations) of his father.  However, he has come to the latter half of his life and has realized that while he has a pure and perfect love for acting on the stage, he doesn’t have any talent for it.  So, he now finds himself teaching high school theater in Tucson for gas money.

The highlight of each semester is, of course, the staging of a big play.  Marschz typically stages plays based on recent popular movies (Erin Brockovich, for example), and he’s as good of a director as he is an actor, which is that he isn’t.  His nemesis is a young boy who writes for the school paper and gives his plays scathingly bad reviews.  His cohorts are the two (and only two) theater geek kids in the school, who are equally untalented.

However, with the start of the new semester the class ends up full, due to the cancellation of most other elective courses.  And the influx of new students is made up almost entirely of Hispanic kids, who could not care less about theater, at least at first.  However, Mr. Marschz, while a bit of a Magoo, is not a complete fool or clown, and he does actually manage to begin to reach these keeeds. 

However, just when things are looking up, Marschz learns that the school will be cutting the theater program completely at the end of the semester.  And that his pregnant wife (Keener) is leaving him – for another man, who happens to be their boarder (David Arquette) as well as the father of her child.  Oh, and Marschz also learns that he’s infertile and has been “firing blanks”.  And, finally, he falls off his seven year sobriety wagon by going on a bender fueled by schnapps, grain alcohol, and roller skates.

Sounds like a hoot, huh?  Well, he’s also managed to write an original play with the hopes of staging it to show the school that he can, in fact, provide an inspirational and productive theater class environment.  The play is called Hamlet 2, and it is exactly that – the sequel to the play Hamlet, by William Shakespeare.  Now, the fact that all of the principle characters are dead by the end of the original Hamlet is no problem because he devises a…

You know what?  I’ll let you find out that part for yourself.  Suffice it to say that the first 3/4 of the film are a buildup to the grand finale, which is the play.  That leadup is so funny that I was afraid there would be no way for the play-within-the-film to live up to the leadup.  But it does, it is hilarious.

Is the play a success?  Yes.  Is there a happy ending?  Yes.  Does Amy Poehler’s ACLU-lawyer character say that the “Bible humpers” who are protesting the blasphemous content of the play can “suck on a bag of dicks”?  Yes.

If you can see how that line could be funny and absurd, then Hamlet 2 might be the right film for you.

Tropic Thunder (***)

Posted on August 25th, 2008 in Movie Reviews by EngineerBoy

Tropic Thunder is flat out hilarious.  I’m not a huge fan of Ben Stiller’s ouevre (or his movies), and I can’t recall one of his films I really liked or wanted to see more than once.  Zoolander and There’s Something About Mary were okay, but nothing to write home about.  I barely chuckled at either Parents movie.  I couldn’t watch all of the Museum movie.  Can’t really remember any others.

Suffice it to say I’m not a Stiller fanboy.  I’m still not, but I’m a big fan of Tropic Thunder.  The film is the story of the making of the film-within-a-film Tropic Thunder, based on the book by a Vietnam war vet (played pitch-perfectly by Nick Nolte).  The production is struggling, so the director (Steve Coogan) opts to go for a more cinema verite approach, by taking his actors into the deep jungle and filming them with hidden cameras, while the maniacal effects supervisor (Danny McBride) shell-shocks them with explosions, incoming fire, and other nastiness.

Hilarity ensues, as they say.

First of all, Jack Black’s performance is spectacular – he looks like Brian Dennehy from 20 years ago, if Dennehy had been in the middle of a roller-coaster, hyper-manic, drug-raged, flame-out-spiral.  I can’t think of another actor today who could have pulled of Black’s role with such…conviction?  Robert Downey Jr. plays a dude who’s playing a dude who’s playing another dude, and puts on an acting tour de farce.  And Ben Stiller manages not to upset the balance – his character is the himbo fading action star desperately hanging on the bottom rung of stardom (and apparently doing a metric buttload of pull-ups, judging from his ripped arms).

Things go off the rail for the production when the actors stumble across actual bad guys – a jungle-dwelling drug kingpin and his village of minions.  The storyline follows the expected path from there, with at least some of the actors thinking that they’re still being tormented by the director in order to give better performances, while others have an inkling that they might be in real trouble.

The film represents a pointy stick right in the eye of Big Hollywood, and it lampoons all facets of the movie business.  Keep your eyes peeled for all the cameos, they come fast and furious, with some celebs playing themselves and other playing thinly-disguised self-parodies (and in some cases both at the same time). 

So, if you like movies, and the movie business, and movies about the movie business, and movies about making movies, then Tropic Thunder may be the movie for you.

Oh, and through the course of the film try to keep a running estimate of the budget for the soundtrack – it had to be monstrous…

« Previous Page — Next Page »